Total body skeletal muscle mass: estimation by creatine (methyl-d3) dilution in humans
Open accessAbstract
Current methods for clinical estimation of total body skeletal muscle mass have significant limitations. We tested the hypothesis that creatine (methyl-d3) dilution (D3-creatine) measured by enrichment of urine D3-creatinine reveals total body creatine pool size, providing an accurate estimate of total body skeletal muscle mass. Healthy subjects with different muscle masses [n = 35: 20 men (19-30 yr, 70-84 yr), 15 postmenopausal women (51-62 yr, 70-84 yr)] were housed for 5 days. Optimal tracer dose was explored with single oral doses of 30, 60, or 100 mg D3-creatine given on day 1. Serial plasma samples were collected for D3-creatine pharmacokinetics. All urine was collected through day 5. Creatine and creatinine (deuterated and unlabeled) were measured by liquid chromatography mass spectrometry. Total body creatine pool size and muscle mass were calculated from D3-creatinine enrichment in urine. Muscle mass was also measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA), and traditional 24-h urine creatinine. D3-creatine was rapidly absorbed and cleared with variable urinary excretion. Isotopic steady-state of D3-creatinine enrichment in the urine was achieved by 30.7 ± 11.2 h. Mean steady-state enrichment in urine provided muscle mass estimates that correlated well with MRI estimates for all subjects (r = 0.868, P < 0.0001), with less bias compared with lean body mass assessment by DXA, which overestimated muscle mass compared with MRI. The dilution of an oral D3-creatine dose determined by urine D3-creatinine enrichment provides an estimate of total body muscle mass strongly correlated with estimates from serial MRI with less bias than total lean body mass assessment by DXA.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Total body scan by DXA shows a value nearly double that of MRI muscle mass.
“However, while appendicular lean mass shows a reduction with DXA vs. MRI, the total body scan shows a value that is nearly double that of the MRI muscle mass.”
From Myosteatosis in the Context of Skeletal Muscle Function Deficit: An Interdisciplinary Workshop at the National Institute on Aging (2020) · cites this paper as Clark et al., 2014
D3-dilution method comes relatively close for estimates of muscle mass compared to MRI.
“Nevertheless, the D3-dilution method actually comes relatively close for estimates of muscle mass when compared to the MRI method (Clark et al., 2014).”
From Myosteatosis in the Context of Skeletal Muscle Function Deficit: An Interdisciplinary Workshop at the National Institute on Aging (2020) · cites this paper as Clark et al., 2014
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 39 · Cited by 176
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [32]Stimpson SA, Turner SM, Clifton LG, Poole JC, Mohammed HA, Shearer TW, Waitt GM, Hagerty LL, Remlinger KS, Hellerstein MK, Evans WJ. Total-body creatine pool size and skeletal muscle mass determination by creatine-(methyl-D3) dilution in rats. J Appl Physiol 112: 1940–1948, 2012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Authors
- Clark, R. V., Walker, A. C., O'Connor-Semmes, R. L., Leonard, M. S., Miller, R. R., Stimpson, S. A., Turner, S. M., Ravussin, E., Cefalu, W. T., Hellerstein, M. K., & Evans, W. J.
- Affiliations
- GlaxoSmithKline (United States) (US)
- Muscle Metabolism Discovery Performance Unit, Metabolic Pathways and Cardiovascular Therapeutic Area, GlaxoSmithKline R&D, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina;
- KineMed (United States) (US)
- Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, Louisiana; and
- Pennington Biomedical Research Center (US)
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- Corresponding author
- Clark, Richard V.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Physiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 2014-06-15
- Volume
- 116
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1605-1613
- ISSN
- 0161-7567 (ISSN-L)
- 8750-7587
- 1522-1601
- PMC
- PMC4064374
- OpenAlex
- W2145660772
- Cited by
- 176
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 4.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of Applied Physiology (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DukeSpace (Duke University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (U54GM104940)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
- Keywords
- magnetic resonance imaging, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, lean body mass, postmenopausal women
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Body Composition, Chromatography, Liquid, Creatine, Creatinine, Female, Humans, Indicator Dilution Techniques, Male, Middle Aged, Mass Spectrometry, Muscle, Skeletal
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review