Cited by 10Cardiovascular and exercise physiologyCardiovascular Effects of ExerciseCardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention

Vascular-ventricular coupling during exercise is not affected by exaggerated blood pressures in endurance-trained athletes

Currie, Katharine D., Sasson, Zion, Goodman, Jack M.·2019·Journal of Applied Physiology

Abstract

This study sought to examine whether cardiovascular performance during exercise, assessed using the vascular-ventricular coupling index (VVC), was affected by exaggerated blood pressure (EBP) responses in endurance-trained athletes. Subjects were middle-aged endurance-trained men and women. Blood pressure measurements and left ventricular echocardiography were performed in a semiupright position at rest and during steady-state cycling at workloads that elicited 100-110 beats/min ( stage 1 ) and 130-140 beats/min ( stage 2 ). These data were used to calculate effective arterial elastance index ( E a I), left ventricular end-systolic elastance index ( E LV I), and their ratio (VVC). Additional measurements of left ventricular volumes and function (i.e., stroke volume, cardiac output, and longitudinal strain) and indirect assessments of peripheral vascular function (i.e., total arterial compliance and peripheral vascular resistance) were examined. Fourteen subjects with EBP (EBP+, 50% men) and 14 sex-matched subjects without EBP (EBP-) participated, with results presented as EBP+ versus EBP-. E a I and E LV I increased from rest to exercise while VVC decreased, but only E LV I was different between groups at stage 1 [7.6 (1.8) vs. 6.4 (1.0) mmHg·ml -1 ·m -2 , P = 0.045] and stage 2 [10.3 (1.6) vs. 8.0 (1.7) mmHg·ml -1 ·m -2 , P E a I and E LV I, and the absence of between-group differences in left ventricular or peripheral vascular function suggests that other factors may contri…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/japplphysiol.00108.2019

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Currie, K. D., Sasson, Z., & Goodman, J. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Mount Sinai Hospital (CA)
Corresponding author
Goodman, Jack M.
Venue
Journal of Applied Physiology
Published
2019-09-01
Volume
127
Issue
3
Pages
753-759
ISSN
  • 0161-7567 (ISSN-L)
  • 8750-7587
  • 1522-1601
OpenAlex
W2963300306
Cited by
10
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2
FWCI
0.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Gouvernement du Canada | Canadian Institutes of Health Research (Instituts de recherche en santé du Canada) (MOP-130477, MFE-140863)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
Keywords
endurance athletes, exercise hemodynamics, effective arterial elastance, left ventricular end-systolic elastance, Frank-Starling mechanism, left ventricular function, peripheral vascular function, arterial compliance, systemic vascular resistance, submaximal exercise, middle-aged adults
MeSH terms
Endurance Training, Arteries, Blood Pressure, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Ventricular Function, Left

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review