The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Topographical distribution of pulmonary perfusion and ventilation, assessed by PET in supine and prone humans
Abstract
Using positron emission tomography (PET) and intravenously injected 13 N 2, we assessed the topographical distribution of pulmonary perfusion (Q˙) and ventilation (V˙) in six healthy, spontaneously breathing subjects in the supine and prone position. In this technique, the intrapulmonary distribution of 13 N 2, measured during a short apnea, is proportional to regional Q˙. After resumption of breathing, regional specific alveolar V˙(sV˙a, ventilation per unit of alveolar gas volume) can be calculated from the tracer washout rate. The PET scanner imaged 15 contiguous, 6-mm-thick, slices of lung. Vertical gradients ofQ˙ and sV˙a were computed by linear regression, and spatial heterogeneity was assessed from the squared coefficient of variation (CV 2). Both CV[Formula: see text] and CV[Formula: see text] were corrected for the estimated contribution of random imaging noise. We found that 1) both Q˙ and V˙ had vertical gradients favoring dependent lung regions, 2) vertical gradients were similar in the supine and prone position and explained, on average, 24% ofQ˙ heterogeneity and 8% of V˙ heterogeneity, 3) CV[Formula: see text] was similar in the supine and prone position, and 4) CV[Formula: see text] was lower in the prone position. We conclude that, in recumbent, spontaneously breathing humans, 1) vertical gradients favoring dependent lung regions explain a significant fraction of heterogeneity, especially ofQ˙, and 2) although Q˙ does not seem to be systematically more homogeneous in the prone position, differences in individual behaviors may make the prone position advantageous, in terms of V˙-to-Q˙ matching, in selected subjects.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Effect of prone positioning on the survival of patients with acute respiratory failure.
Gattinoni, L., Tognoni, G., Pesenti, A., Taccone, P., Mascheroni, D., Labarta, V., Malacrida, R., Di Giulio, P., Fumagalli, R., Pelosi, P., et al. (2001) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa010043 · Cited by 1,271
Cited by
Self-organized patchiness in asthma as a prelude to catastrophic shifts
Venegas, J. G., Winkler, T., Musch, G., Vidal Melo, M. F., Layfield, D., Tgavalekos, N., Fischman, A. J., Callahan, R. J., Bellani, G., & Scott Harris, R. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03490 · Cited by 572
Self-citationProne position in ARDS patients: why, when, how and for whom
Guérin, C., Albert, R. K., Beitler, J., Gattinoni, L., Jaber, S., Marini, J. J., Munshi, L., Papazian, L., Pesenti, A., Vieillard-Baron, A., et al. (2020) · Intensive Care Medicine · doi:10.1007/s00134-020-06306-w · Cited by 532
Metadata
- Authors
- Musch, G., Layfield, J. D. H., Harris, R. S., Melo, M. F. V., Winkler, T., Callahan, R. J., Fischman, A. J., & Venegas, J. G.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Physiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 2002-11-01
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1841-1851
- ISSN
- 0161-7567 (ISSN-L)
- 8750-7587
- 1522-1601
- OpenAlex
- W2105652385
- Cited by
- 237
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Topographical distribution of pulmonary perfusion and ventilation, assessed by PET in supine and prone humans. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/japplphysiol.00223.2002
- The paper
- Musch, G., Layfield, J. D. H., Harris, R. S., Melo, M. F. V., Winkler, T., Callahan, R. J., Fischman, A. J., & Venegas, J. G. (2002). Topographical distribution of pulmonary perfusion and ventilation, assessed by PET in supine and prone humans. Journal of Applied Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00223.2002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.