Cited by 98

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Distinct fast and slow processes contribute to the selection of preferred step frequency during human walking

Snaterse, Mark, Ton, Robert, Kuo, Arthur D., Donelan, J. Maxwell·2011·Journal of Applied Physiology

Abstract

Humans spontaneously select a step frequency that minimizes the energy expenditure of walking. This selection might be embedded within the neural circuits that generate gait so that the optimum is pre-programmed for a given walking speed. Or perhaps step frequency is directly optimized, based on sensed feedback of energy expenditure. Direct optimization is expected to be slow due to the compounded effect of delays and iteration, whereas a pre-programmed mechanism presumably allows for faster step frequency selection, albeit dependent on prior experience. To test for both pre-programmed selection and direct optimization, we applied perturbations to treadmill walking to elicit transient changes in step frequency. We found that human step frequency adjustments ( n = 7) occurred with two components, the first dominating the response (66 ± 10% of total amplitude change; mean ± SD) and occurring quite quickly (1.44 ± 1.14 s to complete 95% of total change). The other component was of smaller amplitude (35 ± 10% of total change) and took tens of seconds (27.56 ± 16.18 s for 95% completion). The fast process appeared to be too fast for direct optimization and more indicative of a pre-programmed response. It also persisted even with unusual closed-loop perturbations that conflicted with prior experience and rendered the response energetically suboptimal. The slow process was more consistent with the timing expected for direct optimization. Our interpretation of these results is that humans may rely heavily on pre-programmed gaits to rapidly select their preferred step frequency and then gradually fine-tune that selection with direct optimization.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/japplphysiol.00536.2010

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. 10.1152/jappl.1997.82.6.1811 · DOI
  2. 10.1152/jappl.1998.84.6.1827 · DOI
  3. 10.1007/BF01731318 · DOI
  4. 10.1152/jappl.1979.46.4.843 · DOI
  5. 10.1242/jeb.01498 · DOI
  6. 10.1006/jtbi.2001.2279 · DOI
  7. Brockway JM, 1987, Hum Nutr Clin Nutr, 41, 463
  8. 10.1152/jappl.1991.71.6.2198 · DOI
  9. 10.1113/jphysiol.1971.sp009498 · DOI
  10. 10.1098/rsif.2008.0415 · DOI
  11. 10.1113/jphysiol.1987.sp016527 · DOI
  12. 10.1113/jphysiol.2003.042259 · DOI
  13. 10.1152/ajpheart.01274.2005 · DOI
  14. 10.1113/jphysiol.2008.164640 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/0034-5687(79)90082-3 · DOI
  16. 10.1249/00005768-199104000-00016 · DOI
  17. 10.1080/00222895.1995.9941708 · DOI
  18. 10.1007/s10286-002-0059-1 · DOI
  19. 10.1007/978-1-4615-0713-0_4 · DOI
  20. 10.1152/jappl.1983.55.1.105 · DOI
  21. 10.1123/mcj.6.2.129 · DOI
  22. 10.2522/ptj.20090125 · DOI
  23. 10.1037/0033-2909.109.2.163 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp009887 · DOI
  25. 10.1177/027836499000900206 · DOI
  26. 10.1249/00005768-199508000-00014 · DOI
  27. 10.1152/japplphysiol.00722.2002 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/S0079-6123(03)43012-4 · DOI
  29. 10.1111/j.1469-7793.1999.00273.x · DOI
  30. 10.2165/00007256-199724050-00003 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Ralston HJ, 1958, Int Z Angew Physiol, 17, 277
  32. 10.1152/japplphysiol.00926.2005 · DOI
  33. 10.1080/00222895.1983.10735299 · DOI
  34. 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1994.tb02442.x · DOI
  35. 10.3758/BF03212943 · DOI
  36. Strogatz SH, 1994, Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos: With Applications to Physics, Biology, Chemistry, and Engineering
  37. 10.1242/jeb.000950 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Van de Putte M, 2006, Biomed Mater Eng, 16, 43
  39. 10.1080/00140138008924758 · DOI
  40. 10.1007/BF00430080 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Snaterse, M., Ton, R., Kuo, A. D., & Donelan, J. M.
Affiliations
  • Department of Biomedical Physiology & Kinesiology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada;
  • Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
Venue
Journal of Applied Physiology
Published
2011-06
Volume
110
Issue
6
Pages
1682-1690
ISSN
  • 8750-7587
  • 1522-1601
Cited by
98
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review