Postspaceflight orthostatic hypotension occurs mostly in women and is predicted by low vascular resistance
Abstract
About 20% of astronauts suffer postspaceflight presyncope. We studied pre- to postflight (5- to 16-day missions) cardiovascular responses to standing in 35 astronauts to determine differences between 1) men and women and 2) presyncopal and nonpresyncopal groups. The groups were presyncopal women, presyncopal men, and nonpresyncopal men based on their ability to stand for 10 min postflight. Preflight, women and presyncopal men had low vascular resistance, with the women having the lowest. Postflight, women experienced higher rates of presyncope (100 vs. 20%; P = 0.001) and greater losses of plasma volume (20 vs. 7%; P < 0.05) than men. Also, presyncopal subjects had lower standing mean arterial pressure (P ≤ 0.001) and vascular resistance ( P < 0.05), smaller increases in norepinephrine ( P ≤ 0.058) and greater increases in epinephrine ( P ≤ 0.058) than nonpresyncopal subjects. Presyncopal subjects had a strong dependence on plasma volume to maintain standing stroke volume. These findings suggest that postflight presyncope is greatest in women, and this can be ascribed to a combination of inherently low-resistance responses, a strong dependence on volume status, and relative hypoadrenergic responses. Conversely, high vascular resistance and postflight hyperadrenergic responses prevent presyncope.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Women, the predominant group afflicted by POTS, appear to be more susceptible to cardiovascular deconditioning.
“like with spaceflight, women, the predominant group afflicted by POTS, appear to be more susceptible (16,28,29).”
From Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome (2019) · cites this paper as [28]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 39 · Cited by 232
- Authors
- Waters, W. W., Ziegler, M. G., & Meck, J. V.
- Affiliations
- National Space Biomedical Research Institute (US)
- University of California San Diego (US)
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration (US)
- ORCID
- Ziegler, Michael G.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Physiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 2002-02-01
- Volume
- 92
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 586-594
- ISSN
- 0161-7567 (ISSN-L)
- 8750-7587
- 1522-1601
- OpenAlex
- W2140330644
- Cited by
- 232
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 8.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Applied Physiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- NASA STI Repository (National Aeronautics and Space Administration) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Center for Research Resources (M01 RR-08827)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Spaceflight effects on biology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
- Keywords
- presyncope, astronauts, sex differences, vascular resistance, plasma volume, norepinephrine, epinephrine, standing blood pressure, stroke volume, spaceflight
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Blood Volume, Disease Susceptibility, Female, Forecasting, Hemodynamics, Humans, Hypotension, Orthostatic, Male, Sex Characteristics, Space Flight, Syncope, Time Factors, Vascular Resistance, Incidence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review