Cited by 232Spaceflight effects on biologyCardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic DisordersHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control

Postspaceflight orthostatic hypotension occurs mostly in women and is predicted by low vascular resistance

Waters, Wendy W., Ziegler, Michael G., Meck, Janice V.·2002·Journal of Applied Physiology

Abstract

About 20% of astronauts suffer postspaceflight presyncope. We studied pre- to postflight (5- to 16-day missions) cardiovascular responses to standing in 35 astronauts to determine differences between 1) men and women and 2) presyncopal and nonpresyncopal groups. The groups were presyncopal women, presyncopal men, and nonpresyncopal men based on their ability to stand for 10 min postflight. Preflight, women and presyncopal men had low vascular resistance, with the women having the lowest. Postflight, women experienced higher rates of presyncope (100 vs. 20%; P = 0.001) and greater losses of plasma volume (20 vs. 7%; P < 0.05) than men. Also, presyncopal subjects had lower standing mean arterial pressure (P ≤ 0.001) and vascular resistance ( P < 0.05), smaller increases in norepinephrine ( P ≤ 0.058) and greater increases in epinephrine ( P ≤ 0.058) than nonpresyncopal subjects. Presyncopal subjects had a strong dependence on plasma volume to maintain standing stroke volume. These findings suggest that postflight presyncope is greatest in women, and this can be ascribed to a combination of inherently low-resistance responses, a strong dependence on volume status, and relative hypoadrenergic responses. Conversely, high vascular resistance and postflight hyperadrenergic responses prevent presyncope.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/japplphysiol.00544.2001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Women, the predominant group afflicted by POTS, appear to be more susceptible to cardiovascular deconditioning.

    “like with spaceflight, women, the predominant group afflicted by POTS, appear to be more susceptible (16,28,29).”

    From Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome (2019) · cites this paper as [28]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 39 · Cited by 232

Authors
Waters, W. W., Ziegler, M. G., & Meck, J. V.
Affiliations
  • National Space Biomedical Research Institute (US)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration (US)
Venue
Journal of Applied Physiology
Published
2002-02-01
Volume
92
Issue
2
Pages
586-594
ISSN
  • 0161-7567 (ISSN-L)
  • 8750-7587
  • 1522-1601
OpenAlex
W2140330644
Cited by
232
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 10
FWCI
8.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • NASA STI Repository (National Aeronautics and Space Administration) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Center for Research Resources (M01 RR-08827)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Spaceflight effects on biology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Keywords
presyncope, astronauts, sex differences, vascular resistance, plasma volume, norepinephrine, epinephrine, standing blood pressure, stroke volume, spaceflight
MeSH terms
Adult, Blood Volume, Disease Susceptibility, Female, Forecasting, Hemodynamics, Humans, Hypotension, Orthostatic, Male, Sex Characteristics, Space Flight, Syncope, Time Factors, Vascular Resistance, Incidence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review