Reply to Lundberg, Larsen, and Weitzberg
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The expert consensus view is that nitrate supplementation with vegetable products such as beetroot juice is very unlikely to be harmful.
“The expert consensus view is that nitrate supplementation with vegetable products such as beetroot juice is very unlikely to be harmful [78, 79].”
From Dietary Nitrate Supplementation and Exercise Performance (2014) · cites this paper as [79]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 14 · Cited by 5
- Authors
- Jones, A. M., Bailey, S. J., Vanhatalo, A., Fulford, J., Gilchrist, M., Benjamin, N., & Winyard, P. G.
- Affiliations
- Sport and Health Sciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences and
- University of Exeter (GB)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Physiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 2011-08
- Volume
- 111
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 619-619
- ISSN
- 0161-7567 (ISSN-L)
- 8750-7587
- 1522-1601
- OpenAlex
- W2028496421
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 14
- Citations by year
- 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 2
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Applied Physiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Exercise and Physiological Responses
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Biomedical and Chemical Research
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Nitrates, Oxygen Consumption, Physical Endurance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
