Effects of high- and low-velocity resistance training on the contractile properties of skeletal muscle fibers from young and older humans.
Open accessAbstract
A two-arm, prospective, randomized, controlled trial study was conducted to investigate the effects of movement velocity during progressive resistance training (PRT) on the size and contractile properties of individual fibers from human vastus lateralis muscles. The effects of age and sex were examined by a design that included 63 subjects organized into four groups: young (20–30 yr) men and women, and older (65–80 yr) men and women. In each group, one-half of the subjects underwent a traditional PRT protocol that involved shortening contractions at low velocities against high loads, while the other half performed a modified PRT protocol that involved contractions at 3.5 times higher velocity against reduced loads. Muscles were sampled by needle biopsy before and after the 14-wk PRT program, and functional tests were performed on permeabilized individual fiber segments isolated from the biopsies. We tested the hypothesis that, compared with low-velocity PRT, high-velocity PRT results in a greater increase in the cross-sectional area, force, and power of type 2 fibers. Both types of PRT increased the cross-sectional area, force, and power of type 2 fibers by 8–12%, independent of the sex or age of the subject. Contrary to our hypothesis, the velocity at which the PRT was performed did not affect the fiber-level outcomes substantially. We conclude that, compared with low-velocity PRT, resistance training performed at velocities up to 3.5 times higher against reduced loads is equally effective for eliciting an adaptive response in type 2 fibers from human skeletal muscle.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Six RCTs recruited older adults with low to moderate functioning.
“Most of the studies (14 of 20 [70%]) enrolled community-living older adults who were well functioning, and 6 RCTs recruited older adults with low to moderate functioning.30,33,39,50,51”
From Comparison of Power Training vs Traditional Strength Training on Physical Function in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (2022) · cites this paper as [50]
Power training increases the cross-sectional area and power of type 2 muscle fibers, independent of sex or age.
“Power training has been shown to increase the cross-sectional area and power of type 2 muscle fibers, independent of sex or age.56”
From Comparison of Power Training vs Traditional Strength Training on Physical Function in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (2022) · cites this paper as [56]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 48 · Cited by 140
- Authors
- Claflin, D. R., Larkin, L. M., Cederna, P. S., Horowitz, J. F., Alexander, N. B., Cole, N. M., Galecki, A. T., Chen, S., Nyquist, L. V., Carlson, B. M., Faulkner, J. A., & Ashton-Miller, J. A.
- Affiliations
- Department of Surgery, Section of Plastic Surgery,
- Department of Biomedical Engineering,
- School of Kinesiology, and
- University of Michigan (US)
- Bio Logic Engineering, Inc., Dexter; and
- Institute of Gerontology, Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan,
- Corresponding author
- Claflin, Dennis R.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Physiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 2011-10
- Volume
- 111
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1021-1030
- ISSN
- 0161-7567 (ISSN-L)
- 8750-7587
- 1522-1601
- PMC
- PMC3191797
- OpenAlex
- W2131760648
- Cited by
- 140
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 29
- FWCI
- 13.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- correction (2025-06-10)
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of Applied Physiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Aging (AG015434, AG‐024824, P01AG015434, P30AG024824)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
- Keywords
- resistance training, movement speed, progressive resistance training, skeletal muscle fibers, fast-twitch muscle, vastus lateralis, fiber cross-sectional area, muscle force, muscle power, muscle hypertrophy, aging, sex differences
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Male, Movement, Muscle Contraction, Prospective Studies, Sex Factors, Muscle Fibers, Fast-Twitch, Resistance Training, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review