Peak exercise oxygen uptake during and following long-duration spaceflight
Abstract
This investigation was designed to measure aerobic capacity (V̇o2peak) during and after long-duration International Space Station (ISS) missions. Astronauts (9 males, 5 females: 49 ± 5 yr, 77.2 ± 15.1 kg, 40.6 ± 6.4 ml·kg(-1)·min(-1) [mean ± SD]) performed peak cycle tests ∼90 days before flight, 15 days after launch, every ∼30 days in-flight, and on recovery days 1 (R + 1), R + 10, and R + 30. Expired metabolic gas fractions, ventilation, and heart rate (HR) were measured. Data were analyzed using mixed-model linear regression. The main findings of this study were that V̇o2peak decreased early in-flight (∼17%) then gradually increased during flight but never returned to preflight levels. V̇o2peak was lower on R + 1 and R + 10 than preflight but recovered by R + 30. Peak HR was not different from preflight at any time during or following flight. A sustained decrease in V̇o2peak during and/or early postflight was not a universal finding in this study, since seven astronauts were able to attain their preflight V̇o2peak levels either at some time during flight or on R + 1. Four of these astronauts performed in-flight exercise at higher intensities compared with those who experienced a decline in V̇o2peak, and three had low aerobic capacities before flight. These data indicate that, while V̇o2peak may be difficult to maintain during long-duration ISS missions, aerobic deconditioning is not an inevitable consequence of long-duration spaceflight.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Space deconditioning effects after 6-month ISS missions include decreased calf muscle volume and power, loss of bone mineral density, and reduction of peak oxygen uptake.
“Examples of these effects include decreased calf muscle volume and power, loss of bone mineral density and reduction of peak oxygen uptake (Trappe et al., 2009; Moore et al., 2014; Sibonga et al., 2015).”
From Human Biomechanical and Cardiopulmonary Responses to Partial Gravity – A Systematic Review (2017) · cites this paper as Moore et al., 2014
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 49 · Cited by 133
- Authors
- Moore, A. D., Downs, M. E., Lee, S. M. C., Feiveson, A. H., Knudsen, P., & Ploutz-Snyder, L.
- Affiliations
- Wyle (United States) (US)
- University of Houston (US)
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration (US)
- Danish Aerospace Company, Odense, Denmark; and
- Universities Space Research Association, Houston, Texas
- Corresponding author
- Downs, Meghan E.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Physiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 2014-08-01
- Volume
- 117
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 231-238
- ISSN
- 0161-7567 (ISSN-L)
- 8750-7587
- 1522-1601
- OpenAlex
- W2143567645
- Cited by
- 133
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 7
- FWCI
- 5.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Applied Physiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Spaceflight effects on biology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Space Exploration and Technology
- Keywords
- peak oxygen uptake, cardiorespiratory fitness, long-duration spaceflight, International Space Station, astronauts, post-flight recovery, heart rate, expired gas analysis
- MeSH terms
- Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Oxygen, Space Flight, Time Factors, Weightlessness, Exercise, Astronauts
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review