Anti-TNF Treatment Reduces Rat Skeletal Muscle Wasting in Monocrotaline-Induced Cardiac Cachexia
Abstract
The aim was to explore efficacy of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors in attenuating increases in anorexia and ubiquitin proteasome pathway transcripts in cardiac cachexia, a potentially lethal condition that responds poorly to current treatments. Cardiac cachexia was rapidly induced with monocrotaline in Sprague-Dawley rats. Either soluble TNF receptor-1 or the general inhibitor of TNF production, pentoxifylline, was given to diminish TNF action on the first indication of cachexia. Animals were anesthetized with a ketamine-xylazine-acepromazine cocktail, and then skeletal muscles were removed for subsequent measurements including ubiquitin proteasome pathway transcripts and Western blots. Both soluble TNF receptor-1 and pentoxifylline attenuated losses in both body and skeletal muscle masses and also reduced increases in selected ubiquitin proteasome pathway transcripts. The action of soluble TNF receptor-1 was partly through reversal of reduced food consumption, while the effects of pentoxifylline were independent of food intake. Here we demonstrate, for the first time, that attenuation of anorexia by soluble TNF receptor-1 treatment in monocrotaline-induced cardiac cachexia is responsible for attenuating increases in some ubiquitin proteasome pathway transcripts as well as preserving body mass and attenuating loss of skeletal muscle mass.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
TNF-α plays a dual role in muscle mass regulation, possibly via differential signaling according to receptor binding (TNF-R1 or TNF-R2).
“Mechanistically, TNF-α plays a dual role in muscle mass regulation, possibly via differential signaling according to receptor binding (TNF-R1 or TNF-R2) [32,33].”
From Main Pathogenic Mechanisms and Recent Advances in COPD Peripheral Skeletal Muscle Wasting (2023) · cites this paper as [33]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 36 · Cited by 81
- Authors
- Steffen, B. T., Lees, S. J., & Booth, F. W.
- Affiliations
- University of Missouri (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Physiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 2008-12
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1950-1958
- ISSN
- 0161-7567 (ISSN-L)
- 8750-7587
- 1522-1601
- OpenAlex
- W2053102492
- Cited by
- 81
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 4.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Applied Physiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Fibrosis and Remodeling
- Keywords
- cardiac cachexia, skeletal muscle atrophy, tumor necrosis factor inhibitors, soluble TNF receptor 1, pentoxifylline, monocrotaline, anorexia, ubiquitin-proteasome system, muscle mass loss, weight loss, dietary intake
- MeSH terms
- Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors, Animals, Anorexia, Body Weight, Cachexia, Eating, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Heart Diseases, Male, Organ Size, Pentoxifylline, Poisons, RNA, Blotting, Western, Signal Transduction, Weight Loss, Gene Expression, Monocrotaline, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Muscle, Skeletal, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction, Ubiquitin, Receptors, Tumor Necrosis Factor, Type I, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review