Eye-centered visual receptive fields in the ventral intraparietal area
Open accessAbstract
The ventral intraparietal area (VIP) processes multisensory visual, vestibular, tactile, and auditory signals in diverse reference frames. We recently reported that visual heading signals in VIP are represented in an approximately eye-centered reference frame when measured using large-field optic flow stimuli. No VIP neuron was found to have head-centered visual heading tuning, and only a small proportion of cells had reference frames that were intermediate between eye- and head-centered. In contrast, previous studies using moving bar stimuli have reported that visual receptive fields (RFs) in VIP are head-centered for a substantial proportion of neurons. To examine whether these differences in previous findings might be due to the neuronal property examined (heading tuning vs. RF measurements) or the type of visual stimulus used (full-field optic flow vs. a single moving bar), we have quantitatively mapped visual RFs of VIP neurons using a large-field, multipatch, random-dot motion stimulus. By varying eye position relative to the head, we tested whether visual RFs in VIP are represented in head- or eye-centered reference frames. We found that the vast majority of VIP neurons have eye-centered RFs with only a single neuron classified as head-centered and a small minority classified as intermediate between eye- and head-centered. Our findings suggest that the spatial reference frames of visual responses in VIP may depend on the visual stimulation conditions used to measure RFs and might also be influenced by how attention is allocated during stimulus presentation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
VIP receives inputs from multiple sensory modalities, including visual, tactile, and auditory sources, and integrates visuotactile stimuli.
“receives inputs from multiple sensory modalities, including visual, tactile, and auditory sources (Duhamel et al. 1998; Schlack et al. 2005; Chen et al. 2014), and integrate visuotactile stimuli (Guipponi et al. 2015; Cléry et al. 2018).”
From Neuroanatomical correlates of peripersonal space: bridging the gap between perception, action, emotion and social cognition (2024) · cites this paper as Chen et al. 2014
Cites
A computational perspective on the neural basis of multisensory spatial representations
Pouget, A., Deneve, S., & Duhamel, J.-R. (2002) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn914 · Cited by 413 · see citing works
Visual-vestibular interactive responses in the macaque ventral intraparietal area (VIP)
Bremmer, F., Klam, F., Duhamel, J., Ben Hamed, S., & Graf, W. (2002) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1046/j.1460-9568.2002.02206.x · Cited by 331 · see citing works
A human parietal face area contains aligned head-centered visual and tactile maps
Sereno, M. I., & Huang, R.-S. (2006) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1777 · Cited by 322 · see citing works
Multisensory Space Representations in the Macaque Ventral Intraparietal Area
Schlack, A., Sterbing-D'Angelo, S. J., Hartung, K., Hoffmann, K.-P., & Bremmer, F. (2005) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0455-05.2005 · Cited by 318 · see citing works
Gu, Y., Watkins, P. V., Angelaki, D. E., & DeAngelis, G. C. (2006) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2356-05.2006 · Cited by 316 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Details have been described in previous publications (Chen et al. 2013a,b,c; Fetsch et al. 2007; Gu et al. 2006; Takahashi et al. 2007).”
MethodSelf-citationHeading encoding in the macaque ventral intraparietal area (VIP)
Bremmer, F., Duhamel, J., Ben Hamed, S., & Graf, W. (2002) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1046/j.1460-9568.2002.02207.x · Cited by 232 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Basile, G. A., Tatti, E., Bertino, S., Milardi, D., Genovese, G., Bruno, A., Muscatello, M. R. A., Ciurleo, R., Cerasa, A., Quartarone, A., et al. (2024) · Brain Structure and Function · doi:10.1007/s00429-024-02781-9 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
“…similarities with premotor area F4 (Rizzolatti et al. 1998), receives inputs from multiple sensory modalities, including visual, tactile, and auditory sources (Duhamel et al. 1998; Schlack et al. 2005; Chen et al. 2014), and integrate visuotactile stimuli (Guipponi et al. 2015; Cléry et al. 2018).”
BackgroundThe macaque ventral intraparietal area has expanded into three homologue human parietal areas
Foster, C., Sheng, W.-A., Heed, T., & Ben Hamed, S. (2022) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2021.102185 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
- Authors
- Chen, X., DeAngelis, G. C., & Angelaki, D. E.
- Affiliations
- Baylor College of Medicine (US)
- University of Rochester (US)
- Corresponding author
- Angelaki, Dora E.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurophysiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 2014-07-15
- Volume
- 112
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 353-361
- ISSN
- 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1598
- PMC
- PMC4064410
- OpenAlex
- W2150136613
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3
- FWCI
- 3.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of Neurophysiology (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Eye Institute (R01EY017866, R01EY016178)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Keywords
- ventral intraparietal area, visual receptive fields, spatial reference frames, optical flow, random dot motion, eye position, multisensory integration, attention
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Brain Mapping, Macaca mulatta, Male, Neurons, Parietal Lobe, Photic Stimulation, Visual Fields
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review