Cited by 28Visual perception and processing mechanismsMultisensory perception and integrationMotor Control and Adaptation

Eye-centered visual receptive fields in the ventral intraparietal area

Open access
Chen, Xiaodong, DeAngelis, Gregory C., Angelaki, Dora E.·2014·Journal of Neurophysiology

Abstract

The ventral intraparietal area (VIP) processes multisensory visual, vestibular, tactile, and auditory signals in diverse reference frames. We recently reported that visual heading signals in VIP are represented in an approximately eye-centered reference frame when measured using large-field optic flow stimuli. No VIP neuron was found to have head-centered visual heading tuning, and only a small proportion of cells had reference frames that were intermediate between eye- and head-centered. In contrast, previous studies using moving bar stimuli have reported that visual receptive fields (RFs) in VIP are head-centered for a substantial proportion of neurons. To examine whether these differences in previous findings might be due to the neuronal property examined (heading tuning vs. RF measurements) or the type of visual stimulus used (full-field optic flow vs. a single moving bar), we have quantitatively mapped visual RFs of VIP neurons using a large-field, multipatch, random-dot motion stimulus. By varying eye position relative to the head, we tested whether visual RFs in VIP are represented in head- or eye-centered reference frames. We found that the vast majority of VIP neurons have eye-centered RFs with only a single neuron classified as head-centered and a small minority classified as intermediate between eye- and head-centered. Our findings suggest that the spatial reference frames of visual responses in VIP may depend on the visual stimulation conditions used to measure RFs and might also be influenced by how attention is allocated during stimulus presentation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/jn.00057.2014

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, X., DeAngelis, G. C., & Angelaki, D. E.
Affiliations
  • Baylor College of Medicine (US)
  • University of Rochester (US)
Corresponding author
Angelaki, Dora E.
Venue
Journal of Neurophysiology
Published
2014-07-15
Volume
112
Issue
2
Pages
353-361
ISSN
  • 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1598
OpenAlex
W2150136613
Cited by
28
References
6
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3
FWCI
3.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neurophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Eye Institute (R01EY017866, R01EY016178)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
Keywords
ventral intraparietal area, visual receptive fields, spatial reference frames, optical flow, random dot motion, eye position, multisensory integration, attention
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain Mapping, Macaca mulatta, Male, Neurons, Parietal Lobe, Photic Stimulation, Visual Fields

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review