Cited by 66Epilepsy research and treatmentNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeural dynamics and brain function

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Excitatory Input Onto Hilar Somatostatin Interneurons Is Increased in a Chronic Model of Epilepsy

Open access

Abstract

The density of somatostatin (SOM)-containing GABAergic interneurons in the hilus of the dentate gyrus is significantly decreased in both human and experimental temporal lobe epilepsy. We used the pilocarpine model of status epilepticus and temporal lobe epilepsy in mice to study anatomical and electrophysiological properties of surviving somatostatin interneurons and determine whether compensatory functional changes occur that might offset loss of other inhibitory neurons. Using standard patch-clamp techniques and pipettes containing biocytin, whole cell recordings were obtained in hippocampal slices maintained in vitro. Hilar SOM cells containing enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) were identified with fluorescent and infrared differential interference contrast video microscopy in epileptic and control GIN (E GFP-expressing Inhibitory Neurons) mice. Results showed that SOM cells from epileptic mice had 1) significant increases in somatic area and dendritic length; 2) changes in membrane properties, including a small but significant decrease in resting membrane potential, and increases in time constant and whole cell capacitance; 3) increased frequency of slowly rising spontaneous excitatory postsynaptic currents (sEPSCs) due primarily to increased mEPSC frequency, without changes in the probability of release; 4) increased evoked EPSC amplitude; and 5) increased spontaneous action potential generation in cell-attached recordings. Results suggest an increase in excitatory innervation, perhaps on distal dendrites, considering the slower rising EPSCs and increased output of hilar SOM cells in this model of epilepsy. In sum, these changes would be expected to increase the inhibitory output of surviving SOM interneurons and in part compensate for interneuronal loss in the epileptogenic hippocampus.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/jn.00147.2010

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This is supported by previous observations highlighting an antiepileptic role of Sst+ interneurons, and the observation that susceptible inhibitory interneurons express a high level of the HCN1 channel, whose dysfunction has been linked to several epileptogenesis pathways and the generation of hyperexcitability.

    “This is supported by previous observations highlighting an antiepileptic role of Sst+ interneurons89, and our observation that susceptible inhibitory interneurons express a high level of the HCN1 channel, whose dysfunction has been linked to several epileptogenesis pathways and the generation of hyperexcitability90.”

    From Integrated multimodal cell atlas of Alzheimer’s disease (2024) · cites this paper as [89]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 60

  1. 10.1242/dev.00351 · DOI
  2. 10.1002/cne.20182 · DOI
  3. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.06-05-01452.1986 · DOI
  4. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-11-04616.1999 · DOI
  5. 10.1002/hipo.1056 · DOI
  6. 10.1096/fj.01-0235com · DOI
  7. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19970901)385:3<385::AID-CNE4>3.0.CO;2-# · DOI
  8. 10.1152/jn.1999.81.2.712 · DOI
  9. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-21-09519.1999 · DOI
  10. 10.1002/cne.10183 · DOI
  11. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-15-06650.2002 · DOI
  12. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-07-02556.1999 · DOI
  13. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-17-05312.1996 · DOI
  14. 10.1002/hipo.10190 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/0006-8993(89)90234-5 · DOI
  16. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1710-07.2007 · DOI
  17. Engel J, 1997, Epilepsy: A Comprehensive Textbook, 2417
  18. 10.1016/0306-4522(94)00406-U · DOI
  19. 10.1016/0361-9230(92)90227-O · DOI
  20. 10.1016/j.ymthe.2005.11.008 · DOI
  21. 10.1152/jn.01079.2005 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/S0920-1211(96)00054-X · DOI
  23. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4361-05.2006 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/S0306-4522(98)00302-9 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/S0306-4522(03)00282-3 · DOI
  26. 10.1007/BF00247498 · DOI
  27. 10.1002/cne.902950110 · DOI
  28. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.12-12-04846.1992 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/S0306-4522(99)00474-1 · DOI
  30. 10.1093/brain/89.3.499 · DOI
  31. 10.1097/00005072-199703000-00001 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/S0166-2236(96)01026-0 · DOI
  33. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-21-08087.2000 · DOI
  34. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.15-05-03990.1995 · DOI
  35. 10.1038/nm0997-990 · DOI
  36. 10.1002/cne.10907 · DOI
  37. 10.1002/cne.902900409 · DOI
  38. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-09-03354.2000 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-18-08052.2002 · DOI
  40. 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2006.04.001 · DOI
  41. 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2008.02008.x · DOI
  42. 10.1016/0013-4694(72)90177-0 · DOI
  43. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1962.tb54120.x · DOI
  44. 10.1002/ana.410290316 · DOI
  45. 10.1152/jn.2000.83.5.2916 · DOI
  46. 10.1016/0306-4522(95)00268-N · DOI
  47. 10.1006/exnr.2001.7668 · DOI
  48. 10.1126/science.2879352 · DOI
  49. 10.1002/cne.10630 · DOI
  50. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.04-10-02590.1984 · DOI
  51. 10.1016/j.neures.2005.03.007 · DOI
  52. 10.1002/cne.21207 · DOI
  53. 10.1093/brain/124.4.688 · DOI
  54. 10.1002/ana.410260303 · DOI
  55. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2006.09.039 · DOI
  56. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-18-07256.1998 · DOI
  57. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.14-03-01688.1994 · DOI
  58. 10.1002/cne.20300 · DOI
  59. 10.1073/pnas.88.22.10037 · DOI
  60. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3842-09.2009 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Halabisky, B., Parada, I., Buckmaster, P. S., & Prince, D. A.
Affiliations
Stanford Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Prince, David A.
Venue
Journal of Neurophysiology
Published
2010-10
Volume
104
Issue
4
Pages
2214-2223
ISSN
  • 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1598
OpenAlex
W2051753774
Cited by
66
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 8
FWCI
3.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neurophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS039579)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Epilepsy research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
somatostatin interneurons, dentate gyrus hilus, temporal lobe epilepsy, pilocarpine-induced status epilepticus, excitatory synaptic input, spontaneous excitatory postsynaptic currents, dendritic morphology, membrane properties, hippocampus
MeSH terms
Animals, Chronic Disease, Disease Models, Animal, Epilepsy, Female, Interneurons, Male, Organ Culture Techniques, Somatostatin, Dentate Gyrus, Excitatory Postsynaptic Potentials, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review