Cited by 176Tactile and Sensory InteractionsIon Channels and ReceptorsPain Mechanisms and Treatments

Receptive field properties of unmyelinated tactile afferents in the human skin

Wessberg, Johan, Olausson, Håkan, Fernström, Katarina Wiklund, Vallbo, Åke B.·2003·Journal of Neurophysiology

Abstract

We recorded, with the microneurography technique, single-unit impulses from nine cutaneous mechanoreceptive afferents with conduction velocities in the C range and receptive fields in the hairy skin of the forearm. The units responded with high impulse rates to light touch and had low monofilament thresholds. The geography of receptive fields was explored with a scanning method: a lightweight probe with a small and rounded tip was made to scan the field area in a series of closely adjacent tracks while single-unit activity was recorded. The fields of the nine units varied considerably in size as well as complexity. The individual field consisted of one to nine small responsive spots distributed over an area of 1-35 mm(2) when explored with a moving indentation of 5 mN. The fields were roughly round or oval in shape with no preferred orientation. The size of the response differed between individual sensitive spots in a field, suggesting a highly nonuniform terminal organization. The properties of the fields seem consistent with a role of tactile C afferents to provide information about pleasant touch and skin-to-skin contacts to central structures controlling emotions and affiliative behavior.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/jn.00256.2002

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Affective touch is interoceptive, as it is carried by interoceptive C fibres.

    “of which affective touch is interoceptive, as it is carried by interoceptive C fibres (Vallbo et al., 1999; Wessberg et al., 2003)”

    From Atypical interoception as a common risk factor for psychopathology: A review (2021) · cites this paper as Wessberg et al., 2003

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 47 · Cited by 176

Authors
Wessberg, J., Olausson, H., Fernström, K. W., & Vallbo, Å. B.
Affiliations
  • University of Gothenburg (SE)
  • Sahlgrenska University Hospital (SE)
Venue
Journal of Neurophysiology
Published
2003-03-01
Volume
89
Issue
3
Pages
1567-1575
ISSN
  • 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1598
OpenAlex
W1964055928
Cited by
176
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 8
FWCI
1.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neurophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Ion Channels and Receptors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
unmyelinated afferents, receptive fields, cutaneous mechanoreceptors, single-unit activity, microneurography, light touch, hairy skin, forearm, skin-to-skin contact, affiliative behavior
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Mechanoreceptors, Neurons, Afferent, Physical Stimulation, Skin, Touch, Nerve Fibers, Unmyelinated

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review