Natural scenes in tactile texture
Abstract
Sensory systems are designed to extract behaviorally relevant information from the environment. In seeking to understand a sensory system, it is important to understand the environment within which it operates. In the present study, we seek to characterize the natural scenes of tactile texture perception. During tactile exploration complex high-frequency vibrations are elicited in the fingertip skin, and these vibrations are thought to carry information about the surface texture of manipulated objects. How these texture-elicited vibrations depend on surface microgeometry and on the biomechanical properties of the fingertip skin itself remains to be elucidated. Here we record skin vibrations, using a laser-Doppler vibrometer, as various textured surfaces are scanned across the finger. We find that the frequency composition of elicited vibrations is texture specific and highly repeatable. In fact, textures can be classified with high accuracy on the basis of the vibrations they elicit in the skin. As might be expected, some aspects of surface microgeometry are directly reflected in the skin vibrations. However, texture vibrations are also determined in part by fingerprint geometry. This mechanism enhances textural features that are too small to be resolved spatially, given the limited spatial resolution of the neural signal. We conclude that it is impossible to understand the neural basis of texture perception without first characterizing the skin vibrations that drive neural responses, given the complex dependence of skin vibrations on both surface microgeometry and fingertip biomechanics.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
During texture scanning, high-frequency skin oscillations are elicited in the skin that can travel the entire length of the finger and as far away as the wrist.
“During texture scanning, high-frequency skin oscillations are elicited in the skin (Manfredi et al., 2014) that can travel the entire length of the finger (Manfredi et al., 2012) and as far away as the wrist (Delhaye et al., 2012).”
From Biomimetic approaches to bionic touch through a peripheral nerve interface (2015) · cites this paper as Manfredi et al., 2014
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 81 · Cited by 211
- Authors
- Manfredi, L. R., Saal, H. P., Brown, K. J., Zielinski, M. C., Dammann, J. F., Polashock, V. S., & Bensmaia, S. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Chicago (US)
- Kimberly-Clark (United States) (US)
- Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois;
- Venue
- Journal of Neurophysiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 2014-05-01
- Volume
- 111
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1792-1802
- ISSN
- 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1598
- OpenAlex
- W2319663015
- Cited by
- 211
- References
- 81
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 6.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Neurophysiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Keywords
- tactile texture perception, skin vibration, fingertip skin, surface microgeometry, texture classification, high-frequency vibration, laser Doppler vibrometry, tactile exploration
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Female, Fingers, Humans, Male, Touch, Vibration, Touch Perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review