Cited by 317

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Strategies for Dynamic Stability During Locomotion on a Slippery Surface: Effects of Prior Experience and Knowledge

Marigold, Daniel S., Patla, Aftab E.·2002·Journal of Neurophysiology

Abstract

Falls due to slips are prevalent in everyday life. The purpose of this study was to determine the reactive recovery responses used to maintain dynamic stability during an unexpected slip, establish the time course of response adaptation to repeated slip perturbations, and distinguish the proactive strategies for negotiating a slippery surface. Twelve young adults participated in the study in which a slip was generated following foot contact on a set of steel free-wheeling rollers. Surface electromyographic (EMG) data were collected from rectus femoris, biceps femoris, tibialis anterior, and the medial head of gastrocnemius on the perturbed limb. Whole body kinematics were recorded using an optical imaging system: from this the center of mass, foot angle, and medial-lateral stability margins were determined. In addition, braking/loading and accelerating/unloading impulses while in contact with the rollers and the rate of loading the rollers were determined from ground reaction forces. Results demonstrate that the reactive recovery response to the first slip consisted of a rapid onset of a flexor synergy (146–199 ms), a large arm elevation strategy, and a modified swing limb trajectory. With repeated exposure to the slip perturbation, the CNS rapidly adapts within one slip trial through global changes. These changes include the attenuation of muscle response magnitude, reduced braking impulse, landing more flat-footed, and elevating the center of mass. Individuals implement a “surfing strategy” while on the rollers when knowledge of the surface condition was available before hand. Furthermore, knowledge of a slip results in a reduced braking impulse and rate of loading, a shift in medial-lateral center of mass closer to the support limb at foot contact on the rollers and a more flat foot landing. In conclusion, prior experience with the perturbations allows subsequent modification and knowledge of the surface condition results in proactive adjustments to safely traverse the slippery surface.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/jn.00691.2001

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies of walking on compliant and slippery surfaces have found that people tend to use more crouched postures to lower the body's centre of mass, potentially to help avoid falls by reducing the moment arm between the centre of mass and ground reaction forces.

    “Studies of walking on compliant and slippery surfaces have found that people tend to use more crouched postures to lower the body's centre of mass, potentially to help avoid falls by reducing the moment arm between the centre of mass and ground reaction forces (MacLellan & Patla, 2006; Marigold & Patla, 2002).”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. 10.1113/jphysiol.1984.sp015492 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/S0021-9290(00)00037-3 · DOI
  3. 10.1152/jn.1999.81.5.2325 · DOI
  4. 10.1007/s002210100798 · DOI
  5. 10.1007/s002210100681 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/S0021-9290(01)00116-6 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/S0966-6362(01)00150-3 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/S0925-7535(01)00059-5 · DOI
  9. 10.1007/s002210050630 · DOI
  10. 10.1152/jn.1989.62.3.680 · DOI
  11. 10.1007/BF00235630 · DOI
  12. 10.1007/BF00227520 · DOI
  13. 10.1007/BF00406622 · DOI
  14. 10.1080/001401399184712 · DOI
  15. 10.1152/jn.1986.55.6.1369 · DOI
  16. 10.1007/BF00247031 · DOI
  17. 10.1093/gerona/54.6.M281 · DOI
  18. 10.1136/jnnp.65.5.734 · DOI
  19. 10.1080/001401397188323 · DOI
  20. 10.1007/BF00235249 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/0166-2236(82)90204-1 · DOI
  22. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.02-05-00536.1982 · DOI
  23. 10.1152/jn.1986.55.6.1382 · DOI
  24. 10.1152/jn.2000.84.1.65 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/S0021-9290(99)00074-3 · DOI
  26. Patla AE, 2000, Arch Physiol Biochem, 108, 211
  27. 10.1016/S0006-8993(01)02748-2 · DOI
  28. 10.1007/s002210050488 · DOI
  29. 10.1007/s002210050339 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/S0021-9290(00)00200-1 · DOI
  31. 10.1093/gerona/53A.6.M471 · DOI
  32. 10.1093/gerona/54.2.M89 · DOI
  33. 10.1007/s002210050327 · DOI
  34. 10.1093/brain/120.2.327 · DOI
  35. 10.1007/s002210050321 · DOI
  36. 10.1016/S0268-0033(00)00076-0 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Marigold, D. S., & Patla, A. E.
Affiliations
Gait and Posture Lab, Department of Kinesiology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1, Canada
Venue
Journal of Neurophysiology
Published
2002-07-01
Volume
88
Issue
1
Pages
339-353
ISSN
  • 0022-3077
  • 1522-1598
Cited by
317
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review