Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 71

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 68 of the 68 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Inhibitory Feedback Shapes Bipolar Cell Responses in the Rabbit Retina

Molnar, Alyosha, Werblin, Frank·2007·Journal of Neurophysiology
DOI 10.1152/jn.00838.2007
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Retinal bipolar cells can be divided into on and off types based on the polarity of their response to light. Bipolar activity is further shaped by inhibitory inputs, characterized here by the events that occur immediately after the onset of a light step: 1) in most off bipolar cells, excitatory current decreased, whereas inhibitory current increased. These currents reinforced each other, enhancing the light response. 2) In about half of the on cone bipolar cells, the excitatory current increased, whereas inhibitory current decreased, also reinforcing the light response. Both of these reinforcing interactions were mediated by glycinergic inhibition. 3) In the remaining on cone bipolar cells, excitation and inhibition both increased, but inhibition was delayed so that these cells responded transiently. 4) Finally, in rod bipolar cells, excitation and inhibition both increased so that inhibition suppressed excitation, reducing the light response at all time scales. The suppressive inhibition seen in on cone and rod bipolar cells was mediated by GABA. Thus morphologically diverse bipolar cells receive only four main types of inhibitory input, and the majority of “inhibitory” inputs actually serve to enhance excitation.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/jn.00838.2007

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19980706)396:3<351::AID-CNE6>3.0.CO;2-1 · DOI

Cited by

See all 71

Metadata

Authors
Molnar, A., & Werblin, F.
Venue
Journal of Neurophysiology
Publisher
American Physiological Society
Published
2007-12
Volume
98
Issue
6
Pages
3423-3435
ISSN
  • 0022-3077
  • 1522-1598
DOI
10.1152/jn.00838.2007
Cited by
71
References
68
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.