Cited by 79Zebrafish Biomedical Research ApplicationsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchMotor Control and Adaptation

Rhythmic motor activity evoked by NMDA in the spinal zebrafish larva

McDearmid, Jonathan R., Drapeau, Pierre·2006·Journal of Neurophysiology

Abstract

We have examined the localization and activity of the neural circuitry that generates swimming behavior in developing zebrafish that were spinalized to isolate the spinal cord from descending brain inputs. We found that addition of the excitatory amino acid agonist N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) to spinalized zebrafish at 3 days in development induced repeating episodes of rhythmic tail beating activity reminiscent of slow swimming behavior. The neural correlate of this activity, monitored by extracellular recording comprised repeating episodes of rhythmic, rostrocaudally progressing peripheral nerve discharges that alternated between the two sides of the body. Motoneuron recordings revealed an activity pattern comprising a slow oscillatory and a fast synaptic component that was consistent with fictive swimming behavior. Pharmacological and voltage-clamp analysis implicated glycine and glutamate in generation of motoneuron activity. Contralateral alternation of motor activity was disrupted with strychnine, indicating a role for glycine in coordinating left-right alternation during NMDA-induced locomotion. At embryonic stages, while rhythmic synaptic activity patterns could still be evoked in motoneurons, they were typically lower in frequency. Kinematic recordings revealed that prior to 3 days in development, NMDA was unable to reliably generate rhythmic tail beating behavior. We conclude that NMDA induces episodes of rhythmic motor activity in spinalized developing zebrafish that can be monitored physiologically in paralyzed preparations. Therefore as for other vertebrates, the zebrafish central pattern generator is intrinsic to the spinal cord and can operate in isolation provided a tonic source of excitation is given.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/jn.00844.2005

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The isolated zebrafish spinal cord can generate rhythmic activity similar to swimming.

    “However, the isolated zebrafish spinal cord can generate rhythmic activity similar to swimming (McDearmid and Drapeau, 2006; Wahlstrom-Helgren et al., 2019; Wiggin et al., 2012; Wiggin et al., 2014).”

    From Modeling spinal locomotor circuits for movements in developing zebrafish (2021) · cites this paper as McDearmid and Drapeau, 2006

  • Beat-and-glide swimming can be produced in isolated larval zebrafish spinal cord preparations by NMDA application or by optogenetic stimulation of excitatory spinal neurons.

    “Beat-and-glide swimming can be produced in isolated larval zebrafish spinal cord preparations by NMDA application (Lambert et al., 2012; McDearmid and Drapeau, 2006; Wiggin et al., 2012) or by optogenetic stimulation of excitatory spinal neurons (Wahlstrom-Helgren et al., 2019).”

    From Modeling spinal locomotor circuits for movements in developing zebrafish (2021) · cites this paper as McDearmid and Drapeau, 2006

  • Locomotor output has proven to be very robust to sectioning of the spinal cord, leading to the suggestion that redundant rhythm-generating circuits must be present within the spinal cord.

    “Indeed, locomotor output has proven to be very robust to the sectioning of the spinal cord, leading to the suggestion that redundant rhythm-generating circuits must be present within the spinal cord (McDearmid and Drapeau, 2006; Wiggin et al., 2012; Wiggin et al., 2014).”

    From Modeling spinal locomotor circuits for movements in developing zebrafish (2021) · cites this paper as McDearmid and Drapeau, 2006

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 117 · Cited by 79

Authors
McDearmid, J. R., & Drapeau, P.
Affiliations
Montreal General Hospital (CA)
Venue
Journal of Neurophysiology
Published
2006-01
Volume
95
Issue
1
Pages
401-417
ISSN
  • 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1598
OpenAlex
W2045604027
Cited by
79
References
117
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 6
FWCI
1.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neurophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Leicester Research Archive (University of Leicester) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
Keywords
NMDA, fictive locomotion, central pattern generator, spinal cord, zebrafish larvae, swimming behavior, motor neurons, glycine, glutamate, strychnine, left-right alternation, embryonic development, spinalization, rhythmic motor activity
MeSH terms
Animals, Biological Clocks, Larva, Motor Activity, Motor Neurons, Spinal Cord, Swimming, Zebrafish, N-Methylaspartate, Muscle, Skeletal, In Vitro Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review