Vestibular nuclei and cerebellum put visual gravitational motion in context.
Abstract
Animal survival in the forest, and human success on the sports field, often depend on the ability to seize a target on the fly. All bodies fall at the same rate in the gravitational field, but the corresponding retinal motion varies with apparent viewing distance. How then does the brain predict time-to-collision under gravity? A perspective context from natural or pictorial settings might afford accurate predictions of gravity's effects via the recovery of an environmental reference from the scene structure. We report that embedding motion in a pictorial scene facilitates interception of gravitational acceleration over unnatural acceleration, whereas a blank scene eliminates such bias. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) revealed blood-oxygen-level-dependent correlates of these visual context effects on gravitational motion processing in the vestibular nuclei and posterior cerebellar vermis. Our results suggest an early stage of integration of high-level visual analysis with gravity-related motion information, which may represent the substrate for perceptual constancy of ubiquitous gravitational motion.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Sensory information at the brainstem is eventually relayed to the parieto-insular vestibular cortex, which spans the posterior insula and the temporoparietal junction for interoceptive and exteroceptive sensory processing, respectively.
“This sensory information at the brainstem is eventually relayed to the parieto-insular vestibular cortex, which spans the posterior insula and the temporoparietal junction for interoceptive and exteroceptive sensory processing, respectively (De Waele et al., 2001; Miller et al., 2008; Lopez and Blanke, 2011; Lenggenhager and Lopez, 2015).”
From How Processing of Sensory Information From the Internal and External Worlds Shape the Perception and Engagement With the World in the Aftermath of Trauma: Implications for PTSD (2021) · cites this paper as Miller et al., 2008
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 100 · Cited by 86
- Authors
- Miller, W. L., Maffei, V., Bosco, G., Iosa, M., Zago, M., Macaluso, E., & Lacquaniti, F.
- Affiliations
- Fondazione Santa Lucia (IT)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Neurophysiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 2008-04
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1969-1982
- ISSN
- 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1598
- OpenAlex
- W2001636668
- Cited by
- 86
- References
- 100
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 1.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Neurophysiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Cineca Institutional Research Information System (Tor Vergata University) (submittedVersion)
- IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vestibular and auditory disorders
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Keywords
- vestibular nuclei, visual context, perceptual constancy, retinal image motion
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Cerebellum, Female, Fixation, Ocular, Gravitation, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Motion Perception, Oxygen, Photic Stimulation, Posture, Vestibular Nuclei, Visual Perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review