Cited by 86Visual perception and processing mechanismsVestibular and auditory disordersMotor Control and Adaptation

Vestibular nuclei and cerebellum put visual gravitational motion in context.

Miller, William L., Maffei, Vincenzo, Bosco, Gianfranco, Iosa, Marco, Zago, Myrka, Macaluso, Emiliano, Lacquaniti, Francesco·2008·Journal of Neurophysiology

Abstract

Animal survival in the forest, and human success on the sports field, often depend on the ability to seize a target on the fly. All bodies fall at the same rate in the gravitational field, but the corresponding retinal motion varies with apparent viewing distance. How then does the brain predict time-to-collision under gravity? A perspective context from natural or pictorial settings might afford accurate predictions of gravity's effects via the recovery of an environmental reference from the scene structure. We report that embedding motion in a pictorial scene facilitates interception of gravitational acceleration over unnatural acceleration, whereas a blank scene eliminates such bias. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) revealed blood-oxygen-level-dependent correlates of these visual context effects on gravitational motion processing in the vestibular nuclei and posterior cerebellar vermis. Our results suggest an early stage of integration of high-level visual analysis with gravity-related motion information, which may represent the substrate for perceptual constancy of ubiquitous gravitational motion.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/jn.00889.2007

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 100 · Cited by 86

Authors
Miller, W. L., Maffei, V., Bosco, G., Iosa, M., Zago, M., Macaluso, E., & Lacquaniti, F.
Affiliations
Fondazione Santa Lucia (IT)
Venue
Journal of Neurophysiology
Published
2008-04
Volume
99
Issue
4
Pages
1969-1982
ISSN
  • 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1598
OpenAlex
W2001636668
Cited by
86
References
100
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
1.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neurophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Cineca Institutional Research Information System (Tor Vergata University) (submittedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vestibular and auditory disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
Keywords
vestibular nuclei, visual context, perceptual constancy, retinal image motion
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Cerebellum, Female, Fixation, Ocular, Gravitation, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Motion Perception, Oxygen, Photic Stimulation, Posture, Vestibular Nuclei, Visual Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review