Cited by 57Tactile and Sensory InteractionsMotor Control and AdaptationMultisensory perception and integration

Referral of Tactile Sensation to the Tips of L-Shaped Sticks

Yamamoto, Shinya, Moizumi, Shunjiro, Kitazawa, Shigeru·2005·Journal of Neurophysiology

Abstract

When we touch something with a tool, we feel the touch at the tip of the tool rather than at the hand that holds the tool. We reported previously that judging the temporal order of two successive stimuli delivered to the tips of straight sticks held in each hand was dramatically altered by crossing the sticks without changing hand position. The results suggested that tactile signals are referred to the tip of a tool held in the hand. Here we examined temporal order judgement using L-shaped sticks instead of straight ones to determine whether the shape of a tool affects the way tactile signals are referred. Subjects reported the order of stimuli correctly in most trials when the tip of each L-shaped stick occupied the hemispace ipsilateral to the anatomical laterality of the hand holding the L-shaped stick. The subjects, however, misreported the order of stimuli presented at moderately short intervals (<300 ms) when the tip of the stick occupied the hemispace contralateral to the anatomical laterality of the hand holding it. The judgment reversal occurred irrespective of the number of physical crossings between the sticks and the arms (0, 1, and 3), as long as the tips of L-shaped tools were placed in the contralateral hemispace. Our results suggest that our brain refers tactile signals from the hand directly to the location of the tip without much accounting for the route that connects hand and tip.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/jn.01015.2004

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 23 · Cited by 57

Authors
Yamamoto, S., Moizumi, S., & Kitazawa, S.
Affiliations
National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (JP)
Venue
Journal of Neurophysiology
Published
2005-05
Volume
93
Issue
5
Pages
2856-2863
ISSN
  • 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1598
OpenAlex
W2089422410
Cited by
57
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neurophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
Keywords
tool use, temporal order judgment, hand position
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Eye Movements, Female, Humans, Judgment, Functional Laterality, Male, Physical Stimulation, Probability, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Sensation, Sensory Thresholds, Time Factors, Touch

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review