Cited by 286Motor Control and AdaptationNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurobiology of Language and Bilingualism

How self-initiated memorized movements become automatic: A functional MRI study

Wu, Tao, Kansaku, Kenji, Hallett, Mark·2004·Journal of Neurophysiology

Abstract

We used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and dual tasks to investigate the physiology of how movements become automatic. Normal subjects were asked to practice some self-initiated, self-paced, memorized sequential finger movements with different complexity until they could perform the tasks automatically. Automaticity was evaluated by having subjects perform a secondary task simultaneously with the sequential movements. Our secondary task was a letter-counting task where subjects were asked to identify the number of times a target letter from the letter sequences was seen. Only the performances that achieved high accuracy in both single and dual tasks were considered automatic. The fMRI results before and after automaticity was achieved were compared. Our data showed that for both conditions, sequential movements activated similar brain regions. No additional activity was observed in the automatic condition. There was less activity in bilateral cerebellum, presupplementary motor area, cingulate cortex, left caudate nucleus, premotor cortex, parietal cortex, and prefrontal cortex during the automatic stage. These findings suggest that most of the motor network participates in executing automatic movements and that it becomes more efficient as movements become more automatic. Our results do not provide evidence for any area to become more activated for automatic movements.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/jn.01052.2003

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The associative striatum is active during initial skill acquisition.

    “Several studies have reported that the associative striatum is active during initial skill acquisition and that its activity decreases with extended training.”
  • Activation in the associative striatum decreases with extended training.

    “Several fMRI experiments subsequently reported a similar finding – that is, that activation in the associative striatum decreases with training [15–17].”
  • The response of the sensorimotor striatum to extended training depends on the type of task used.

    “On the other hand, there is evidence that the response of the sensorimotor striatum to extended training may depend on the type of task that is used.”
  • In sequence-learning tasks, sensorimotor striatal activation increases with extended training.

    “In tasks that require subjects to learn a sequence of motor responses (e.g., button presses), a variety of fMRI studies have reported that sensorimotor striatal activation increases with extended training [15–17].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 89 · Cited by 286

Authors
Wu, T., Kansaku, K., & Hallett, M.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Venue
Journal of Neurophysiology
Published
2004-04
Volume
91
Issue
4
Pages
1690-1698
ISSN
  • 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1598
OpenAlex
W2064436628
Cited by
286
References
89
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 19
FWCI
5.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neurophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Keywords
motor learning, dual-task performance, cerebellum, pre-supplementary motor area, cingulate cortex, caudate nucleus, premotor cortex, parietal cortex, prefrontal cortex, self-paced movement
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Automatism, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Female, Humans, Functional Laterality, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Memory, Movement, Photic Stimulation, Psychomotor Performance, Task Performance and Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review