Enhancement of visual responsiveness by spontaneous local network activity in vivo
Abstract
Spontaneous activity within local circuits affects the integrative properties of neurons and networks. We have previously shown that neocortical network activity exhibits a balance between excitatory and inhibitory synaptic potentials, and such activity has significant effects on synaptic transmission, action potential generation, and spike timing. However, whether such activity facilitates or reduces sensory responses has yet to be clearly determined. We examined this hypothesis in the primary visual cortex in vivo during slow oscillations in ketamine-xylazine anesthetized cats. We measured network activity (Up states) with extracellular recording, while simultaneously recording postsynaptic potentials (PSPs) and action potentials in nearby cells. Stimulating the receptive field revealed that spiking responses of both simple and complex cells were significantly enhanced (>2-fold) during network activity, as were spiking responses to intracellular injection of varying amplitude artificial conductance stimuli. Visually evoked PSPs were not significantly different in amplitude during network activity or quiescence; instead, spontaneous depolarization caused by network activity brought these evoked PSPs closer to firing threshold. Further examination revealed that visual responsiveness was gradually enhanced by progressive membrane potential depolarization. These spontaneous depolarizations enhanced responsiveness to stimuli of varying contrasts, resulting in an upward (multiplicative) scaling of the contrast response function. Our results suggest that small increases in ongoing balanced network activity that result in depolarization may provide a rapid and generalized mechanism to control the responsiveness (gain) of cortical neurons, such as occurs during shifts in spatial attention.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Enhanced responses to punctate stimuli during low-frequency oscillatory states may be unique to this particular form of sensory stimulus and pathway.
“suggesting that the enhanced responses to punctate stimuli during low frequency oscillatory states may be unique to this particular form of sensory stimulus and pathway”
From Waking state: rapid variations modulate neural and behavioral responses (2015) · cites this paper as Haider et al., 2007
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 82 · Cited by 130
- Authors
- Haider, B., Duque, A., Hasenstaub, A. R., Yu, Y., & McCormick, D. A.
- Affiliations
- Yale University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Neurophysiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 2007-06
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 4186-4202
- ISSN
- 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1598
- OpenAlex
- W2106797492
- Cited by
- 130
- References
- 82
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 6.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Neurophysiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Keywords
- spontaneous network activity, primary visual cortex, slow oscillations, up states, visual responsiveness, contrast response function, membrane depolarization, postsynaptic potentials, simple and complex cells, excitation-inhibition balance, gain control, spatial attention
- MeSH terms
- Action Potentials, Animals, Cats, Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation, Electric Stimulation, Female, Nerve Net, Neurons, Photic Stimulation, Reaction Time, Visual Cortex, Nonlinear Dynamics, Patch-Clamp Techniques, Excitatory Postsynaptic Potentials
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review