Cited by 167Animal Vocal Communication and BehaviorNeuroscience and Music PerceptionMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Model of birdsong learning based on gradient estimation by dynamic perturbation of neural conductances

Fiete, Ila R., Fee, Michale S., Seung, H. Sebastian·2007·Journal of Neurophysiology

Abstract

We propose a model of songbird learning that focuses on avian brain areas HVC and RA, involved in song production, and area LMAN, important for generating song variability. Plasticity at HVC --> RA synapses is driven by hypothetical "rules" depending on three signals: activation of HVC --> RA synapses, activation of LMAN --> RA synapses, and reinforcement from an internal critic that compares the bird's own song with a memorized template of an adult tutor's song. Fluctuating glutamatergic input to RA from LMAN generates behavioral variability for trial-and-error learning. The plasticity rules perform gradient-based reinforcement learning in a spiking neural network model of song production. Although the reinforcement signal is delayed, temporally imprecise, and binarized, the model learns in a reasonable amount of time in numerical simulations. Varying the number of neurons in HVC and RA has little effect on learning time. The model makes specific predictions for the induction of bidirectional long-term plasticity at HVC --> RA synapses.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/jn.01311.2006

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Birdsong learning is driven by reinforcement learning using a specialized cost function that relies on comparison with a memorized version of a tutor's song, and it involves specialized structures for controlling song variability during learning.

    “Likewise, it is believed that birdsong learning is driven by reinforcement learning using a specialized cost function that relies on comparison with a memorized version of a tutor's song (Fiete et al., 2007), and also that it involves specialized structures for controlling song variability during learning (Aronov et al., 2011).”

    From Toward an integration of deep learning and neuroscience (2016) · cites this paper as Fiete et al., 2007

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 76 · Cited by 167

Authors
Fiete, I. R., Fee, M. S., & Seung, H. S.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
Journal of Neurophysiology
Published
2007-10
Volume
98
Issue
4
Pages
2038-2057
ISSN
  • 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1598
OpenAlex
W2106437793
Cited by
167
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 6
FWCI
8.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neurophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology › Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
songbird vocal learning, HVC, Ras, LMAN, synaptic plasticity, spiking neural network model, song variability, delayed reinforcement
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Animals, Learning, Models, Neurological, Motor Neurons, Neural Conduction, Neuronal Plasticity, Neurons, Pitch Perception, Reinforcement, Psychology, Synapses, Vocalization, Animal, Finches

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review