The DOI matches its Crossref record.
THE FUNCTIONAL SIGNIFICANCE OF THE ROSTRAL CINGULAR CORTEX AS REVEALED BY ITS RESPONSES TO ELECTRICAL EXCITATION
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Several studies in monkeys and other animals, such as the one illustrated in Figure 2, show that electrical stimulation elicits autonomic responses from MFa and OFa, but not from PFm or PFo (54–60).”
From Localization of Dysfunction in Major Depressive Disorder: Prefrontal Cortex and Amygdala (2011) · cites this paper as [55]
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–102 of 102
An, X., Bandler, R., �ng�r, D., & Price, J. L. (1998) · The Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/(sici)1096-9861(19981130)401:4
Rempel-Clower, N. L., & Barbas, H. (1998) · The Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/(sici)1096-9861(19980831)398:3
Metadata
- Authors
- Smith, W. K.
- Corresponding author
- Smith, Wilbur K.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurophysiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 1945-07-01
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 241-255
- ISSN
- 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1598
- OpenAlex
- W2321381913
- Cited by
- 349
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 6.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Neurophysiology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Keywords
- cingulate cortex, electrical stimulation, cortical responses, functional significance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
