Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 312

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Nonspiking interneurons in walking system of the cockroach

Pearson, K. G., Fourtner, C. R.·1975·Journal of Neurophysiology

Abstract

Intracellular recordings were made from the neurites of interneurons and motoneurons in the metathoracic ganglion of the cockroach, Periplaneta americana. Many neurons were penetrated which failed to produce action potentials on the application of large depolarizing currents. Nevertheless, some of them strongly excited and/or inhibited slow motoneurons innervating leg musculature, even with weak depolariziing musculature, even with weak depolarizing currents. Cobalt-sulfide-straining of these nonspiking neurons showed them to be interneurons with their neurites contained entirely within the metathoracic ganglion. Two further characteristics of these interneurons were rapid spontaneous fluctuations in membrane potential and a low resting membrane potential. One nonspiking neuron, interneuron I, when depolarized caused a strong excitation of the set of slow levator motoneurons which discharge in bursts during stepping movements of the metathoracic leg. During rhythmic leg movements the membrane potential of interneuron I oscillated with the depolarizing phases occurring at the same time as bursts of activity in the levator motorneurons. No spiking or any other nonspiking neuron was penetrated which could excite these levator motoneurons. From all these observations we conclude that oscillations in the membrane potential of interneuron I are entirely responsible for producing the levator bursts, and thus for producing stepping movements in a walking animal. During rhythmic leg movements, bursts of activity in levator and depressor motoneurons are initiated by slow graded depolarizations. The similarity of the synaptic activity in these two types of motoneurons suggests that burst activity in the depressor motoneurons is also produced by rhythmic activity in nonspiking interneurons. The fact that no spiking neuron was found to excite the depressor motoneurons supports this conclusion. Interneuron I is also an element of the rhythm-generating system, since short depolarizing pulses applied to it during rhythmic activity could reset the thythm. Long-duration current pulses applied to interneuron I in a quiescent animal did not produce rhythmic activity. This observation, together with the finding that during rhythmic activity the slow depolarizations in interneuron I are usually terminated by IPSPs, suggests that interneuron I alone does not generate the rhythm. No spiking interneurons have yet been enccountered which influence the activity in levator motoneurons. Thus, we conclude that the rhythm is generated in a network of nonspiking interneurons. The cellular mechanisms for generating the oscillations in this network are unknown. Continued.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/jn.1975.38.1.33

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 312

Metadata

Authors
Pearson, K. G., & Fourtner, C. R.
Venue
Journal of Neurophysiology
Published
1975-01-01
Volume
38
Issue
1
Pages
33-52
ISSN
  • 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1598
OpenAlex
W187849060
Cited by
312
References
0
FWCI
8.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nonspiking interneurons in walking system of the cockroach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/jn.1975.38.1.33
The paper
Pearson, K. G., & Fourtner, C. R. (1975). Nonspiking interneurons in walking system of the cockroach. Journal of Neurophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1975.38.1.33

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.