Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 168

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Analysis of muscle receptor connections by spike-triggered averaging. 2. Spindle group II afferents

Stauffer, E. K., Watt, D. G., Taylor, A., Reinking, R. M., Stuart, D. G.·1976·Journal of Neurophysiology

Abstract

1. The spike-triggered averaging (STA) method has been used to study synaptic connections of nine spindle group II afferents from medial gastrocnemius to 151 motoneurons of leg muscles in the cat. 2. EPSPs were found in 40 cells, predominantly of triceps surae with latency from cord entry ranging from 0.3 to 4.2 ms. Those with latency less than or equal to 1.4 ms were deduced to be monosynaptic in confirmation of Kirkwood and Sears (13). Mean amplitude for MG-LGS cells was 30.1 muV and mean rise time 1.0 ms (compared with 65.4 muV and 1.0 ms for monosynaptic Ia EPSPs from the preceding report (26)). It is argued that monosynaptic latency for spindle group II afferents could be as large as 1.65 ms. 3. The occurrence of a presynaptic spike permitted the division of EPSP latencies into central conduction time and synaptic delay components. Sindle group II central conduction times were significantly longer than those of Ia afferents, while there were no differences in the synaptic delays associated with the two afferent types. 4. EPSPs of longer latency were judged to be di- or trisynaptic. They were smaller and had longer rise times than the monosynaptic effects. Evidence is presented to show that short rise time of an individual PSP does not guarantee that it is monosynaptic. Rise times are different only on a population basis. 5. Inhibitory responses were found with latencies and mean rise times appropriate for di- and trisynaptic connections. Their mean amplitude was 4.6 muV. 6. The distribution of EPSPs and IPSPs was generally consistent with their exerting stretch reflex effects similar to that of Ia afferents and inconsistent with the inclusion of them in the grouping known as “flexor reflex afferents.”

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/jn.1976.39.6.1393

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 168

Metadata

Authors
Stauffer, E. K., Watt, D. G., Taylor, A., Reinking, R. M., & Stuart, D. G.
Venue
Journal of Neurophysiology
Published
1976-11-01
Volume
39
Issue
6
Pages
1393-1402
ISSN
  • 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1598
OpenAlex
W2439585359
Cited by
168
References
0
FWCI
15.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analysis of muscle receptor connections by spike-triggered averaging. 2. Spindle group II afferents. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/jn.1976.39.6.1393
The paper
Stauffer, E. K., Watt, D. G., Taylor, A., Reinking, R. M., & Stuart, D. G. (1976). Analysis of muscle receptor connections by spike-triggered averaging. 2. Spindle group II afferents. Journal of Neurophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1976.39.6.1393

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.