Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 160

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Rat hippocampal neurons in culture: voltage-clamp analysis of inhibitory synaptic connections

Segal, M., Barker, J. L.·1984·Journal of Neurophysiology

Abstract

Inhibitory postsynaptic potentials (IPSPs) recorded at room temperature in cultured rat hippocampal neurons had the same reversal potential as Cl--dependent voltage responses to gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA). The IPSPs had a relatively short latency and long duration and could be evoked for hours without change in their properties. They were consistently depressed by picrotoxin applied near cell bodies of the neurons under study. Postsynaptic cells exhibiting IPSPs were voltage clamped with two electrodes for the purpose of studying the properties of evoked inhibitory postsynaptic currents (IPSCs). The IPSCs shared the same reversal potential and sensitivity to [Cl-]i as was observed with membrane current responses to GABA. They were both depressed by picrotoxin, with little if any change in the kinetics of ion channel activity either estimated from fluctuation analysis of drug-depressed current responses to GABA or calculated from semilogarithmic plots of IPSC decay. The decay of the IPSC was well fitted by a single exponential with a time constant of about 20 ms, which corresponded closely to the estimated average duration of an ion channel activated by GABA. IPSC decay was sensitive to the potential at which the cell was held, increasing by up to 50% in some cells clamped at positive potentials relative to values obtained at the level of the resting potential. IPSCs were enhanced in amplitude by diazepam, which also prolonged their time constant of decay. Diazepam potentiated membrane current responses to GABA and fluctuation analysis of potentiated responses indicated that the drug effects could be accounted for by an increase both in estimated channel duration and channel frequency. IPSCs were also altered by pentobarbital, which markedly prolonged their time constant of decay with little if any change in their amplitude. Pentobarbital enhanced current responses to GABA, an effect that could be accounted for primarily in terms of a pronounced increase in estimated channel lifetime. None of the drugs used in the present study affected the elementary conductance estimated from fluctuation analysis of GABA-evoked current response. The results suggest that IPSPs and IPSCs evoked in these cultured hippocampal cells are mediated by GABA, about 1,700 Cl- ion channels are activated at the peak of the synaptic conductance, and clinically important drugs act postsynaptically on the kinetics of the channels so as to change the amplitude and/or time course of the synaptic conductance.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/jn.1984.52.3.469

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 160

Metadata

Authors
Segal, M., & Barker, J. L.
Venue
Journal of Neurophysiology
Published
1984-09-01
Volume
52
Issue
3
Pages
469-487
ISSN
  • 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1598
OpenAlex
W2411932594
Cited by
160
References
0
FWCI
2.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rat hippocampal neurons in culture: voltage-clamp analysis of inhibitory synaptic connections. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/jn.1984.52.3.469
The paper
Segal, M., & Barker, J. L. (1984). Rat hippocampal neurons in culture: voltage-clamp analysis of inhibitory synaptic connections. Journal of Neurophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1984.52.3.469

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.