Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 194

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Patterns of facilitation and suppression of antagonist forelimb muscles from motor cortex sites in the awake monkey

Cheney, P. D., Fetz, E. E., Palmer, S. S.·1985·Journal of Neurophysiology

Abstract

Patterns of excitatory and inhibitory effects were produced in antagonistic forelimb muscles by single intracortical microstimuli (S-ICMS) applied to motor cortex sites in macaque monkeys performing ramp-and-hold wrist movements. Stimulus-triggered averages (stimulus-TAs) of rectified electromyographic (EMG) activity revealed poststimulus facilitation and/or suppression in identified flexor and extensor muscles of the wrist and fingers. At 22 cortical sites the action potentials of single cells were also recorded and used to compute spike-triggered averages (spike-TAs) of covarying muscles. The set of muscles activated during the movement in which the cell was active are referred to here as "agonists"; those muscles active during wrist movement in the opposite direction are called "antagonists." (At sites where cells were not isolated the muscles showing poststimulus facilitation were called agonists.) Poststimulus effects in agonist muscles typically consisted of facilitation in a subset of the agonists. For 48 sites from which poststimulus effects were tested on both flexors and extensors, the following combinations of effects were observed: 1) pure facilitation of agonist muscles with no effect on antagonists; 2) facilitation of both agonists and antagonists; 3) facilitation of agonist muscles with reciprocal suppression of antagonists; 4) "mixed" facilitation and suppression of synergist muscles; and 5) pure suppression of some muscles with no effect on their antagonists. The suppression effects appeared most commonly in flexor muscles; conversely, facilitation was generally stronger in extensors. Cortical sites eliciting pure suppression of flexor muscles with no facilitation of extensor muscles were found in two monkeys. These purely suppressive effects were observed not only in stimulus-TAs but also in spike-TAs computed from single cells at these sites. Some of these cells increased their activity during wrist extension (but had no detectable effect on the extensor muscles); others discharged during flexion. Several observations suggest that the cortically evoked suppression is mediated by polysynaptic relays. The mean onset latency of the postspike suppression (7.4 ms) produced by inhibitory cells was longer than the mean onset latency of postspike facilitation (6.7 ms) produced by CM cells. Similarly, the mean onset latency of poststimulus suppression (8.9 ms) was longer than that of poststimulus facilitation (8.0 ms). Moreover, suppression was usually weaker than facilitation in the spike-TAs, as well as in stimulus-TAs compiled for the same stimulus intensity.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/jn.1985.53.3.805

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 194

Metadata

Authors
Cheney, P. D., Fetz, E. E., & Palmer, S. S.
Venue
Journal of Neurophysiology
Published
1985-03-01
Volume
53
Issue
3
Pages
805-820
ISSN
  • 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1598
OpenAlex
W2173590051
Cited by
194
References
0
FWCI
2.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Patterns of facilitation and suppression of antagonist forelimb muscles from motor cortex sites in the awake monkey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/jn.1985.53.3.805
The paper
Cheney, P. D., Fetz, E. E., & Palmer, S. S. (1985). Patterns of facilitation and suppression of antagonist forelimb muscles from motor cortex sites in the awake monkey. Journal of Neurophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1985.53.3.805

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.