The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effects of aging, hearing loss, and anatomical location on thresholds of inferior colliculus neurons in C57BL/6 and CBA mice
Abstract
Multiple-unit threshold curves (MTCs) were obtained from inferior colliculus (IC) neurons across much of the (approximately 2-2.5 yr) life-span of two inbred mouse strains: the C57BL/6, which undergoes progressive age-related sensorineural hearing loss; and the CBA, which maintains good sensitivity until well into the second year of life. Tonotopic organization (the orderly dorsoventral arrangement of frequency sensitivity) is disrupted in the IC central nucleus (ICC) of aging C57 mice. Dorsal (low-frequency) MTCs change little during the first year of life, but in more ventral (high-frequency) regions high-frequency portions of MTCs are eliminated, best frequencies become lower, and low-frequency thresholds are reduced. These changes make the curves more similar to one another along the dorsoventral axis. During the second year of life, all thresholds become greatly elevated with neurons throughout the IC responding only to middle frequencies at very high intensities. In C57 mice, Q10 ratios (a measure of MTC tip sharpness) decline after 7 mo. The decline of Q10 with aging is associated with the age-related lowering of best frequencies and elevation of thresholds, both of which are positively correlated with smaller Q10s. The frequency range of C57 MTCs begins to decrease at 14 mo of age, when hearing loss is quite severe at all frequencies. In CBA mice, the above changes are minimal or do not occur even in 22 mo olds, which have moderate loss of sensitivity across all frequencies. Even in young mice (prior to demonstrable cochlear pathology in C57 mice), there are differences in MTCs between the two strains employed, with sensitivity of CBA mice being "shifted" toward higher frequencies. Age-related changes in MTC properties depend on the pattern of hearing loss (e.g., high frequency vs. flat) and the dorsoventral location of neurons within the ICC.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“As there is a well-characterized loss of hearing around 7 months of age in the C57BL/6J strain [46–50]”
From Impaired auditory discrimination learning following perinatal nicotine exposure or β2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subunit deletion (2012) · cites this paper as [48]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Phantom auditory perception (tinnitus): mechanisms of generation and perception
Jastreboff, P. J. (1990) · Neuroscience Research · doi:10.1016/0168-0102(90)90031-9 · Cited by 1,567
Response properties of single auditory nerve fibers in the mouse.
Taberner, A. M., & Liberman, M. (2005) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00574.2004 · Cited by 506
“…is often the background strain in which knockout mice have been produced (Mullen and Ryan 2001) and because it has also been extensively studied as a result of the presence of a type of agerelated hearing loss (Ding et al. 1999; Henry and Lepkowski 1978; Li et al. 1993; Parham 1997; Willott 1986).”
BackgroundMiller, S., Yasuda, M., Coats, J., Jones, Y., Martone, M. E., & Mayford, M. R. (2002) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00978-9 · Cited by 520
Mutant Mice and Neuroscience: Recommendations Concerning Genetic Background
Silva, A. J., Simpson, E. M., Takahashi, J. S., Lipp, H.-P., Nakanishi, S., Wehner, J. M., Giese, K. P., Tully, T., Abel, T., Chapman, P. F., et al. (1997) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80958-7 · Cited by 479
Inhibitory neurotransmission, plasticity and aging in the mammalian central auditory system
Caspary, D. M., Ling, L. L., Turner, J. G., et al. (2008) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.013581 · Cited by 485
“Similar physiological changes occur in C57 and CBA mice (Willott, 1986; Willott et al., 1988; Willott et al., 1991; McFadden and Willott, 1994; Walton et al., 1998; Walton et al., 2002; Simon et al., 2004).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Willott, J. F.
- Corresponding author
- Willott, J. F.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurophysiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 1986-08-01
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 391-408
- ISSN
- 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1598
- OpenAlex
- W1921685703
- Cited by
- 211
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 1.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Neurophysiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5k04ag000234-05)
- National Institute on Aging (KO4-AG-00234, R01-AG-03069)
- National Center for Research Resources (RR07176)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
- Keywords
- inferior colliculus, age-related hearing loss, sensorineural hearing loss, tonotopic organization, characteristic frequency, Q10, central nucleus of inferior colliculus, anatomical location, C57BL/6 mice, CBA mice, mouse strain differences, auditory sensitivity, auditory brainstem
- MeSH terms
- Acoustic Stimulation, Aging, Animals, Auditory Pathways, Hearing Loss, Sensorineural, Inferior Colliculi, Male, Mice, Inbred CBA, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Inbred Strains, Neurons, Afferent, Sensory Thresholds, Species Specificity, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review