Spatial and temporal properties of neurons of the lateral suprasylvian cortex of the cat
Abstract
Neurons in the posteromedial lateral suprasylvian cortex (PMLS) of cats were recorded extracellularly to investigate their response to stimulation by bars and by sinusoidal gratings. Two general types of cells were identified: those that modulated in synchrony with the passage of drifting bars and gratings and those that responded with an unmodulated increase in discharge. Both types responded to contrast reversed gratings with a modulation of activity: the cells that modulated to drifting gratings modulated to the first harmonic of contrast reversed gratings (at appropriate spatial phase and frequency), whereas those that did not modulate to drifting gratings always modulated to the second harmonic of contrast reversed gratings. No cell had a clear null point. Nearly all cells were selective for spatial frequency. The preferred frequency ranged from 0.1 to 1 cycles per degree (cpd), and selectivity bandwidths (full width at half height) were around two octaves. Preferred spatial frequency was not correlated with receptive field size, but bandwidth and receptive field size were positively correlated. Preferred spatial frequency decreased with eccentricity, at about 0.05 octaves/deg. The response of all cells increased as a function of grating contrast up to a saturation level. The contrast threshold for response to a grating of optimal parameters was approximately 1% for most cells and the saturation contrast approximately 10%. The contrast gain was approximately 25 spikes/s per log unit of contrast. All cells were tuned for temporal frequency, preferring frequencies from approximately 3 to 10 Hz, with a selectivity bandwidth approximately 2 octaves. For some cells, the spatial selectivity did not depend on the temporal frequency and vice versa. Others were spatiotemporally coupled, with the preferred temporal frequency being lower at high than at low spatial frequencies, and the preferred spatial frequency lower at high than at low temporal frequencies. Previous results showing broad velocity tuning to a bar were replicated and found to be predictable from the combined spatial and temporal tuning of PMLS cells and the Fourier spectrum of a bar. Preferred temporal frequency steadily decreased with eccentricity, at 0.025 octaves/deg. The results for PMLS cells are compared with those of other visual areas. Acuity and spatial preference and selectivity bandwidth is comparable to all areas except area 17, where they are a factor of about two higher. Temporal selectivity in PMLS is as fine as observed in other areas. The possibility that PMLS cells may be involved with motion detection and detection of motion in depth is discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Neuronal responses in Area V1 are approximately separable.
“The Gabor filters that we use in the algorithm we develop later are separable in the spatial and temporal coordinates and several studies have shown that neuronal responses in Area V1 are approximately separable [54], [55], [56].”
From Motion Tuned Spatio-Temporal Quality Assessment of Natural Videos (2010) · cites this paper as [56]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Motion Tuned Spatio-Temporal Quality Assessment of Natural Videos
Seshadrinathan, K., & Bovik, A. C. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2009.2034992 · Cited by 708 · see citing works
Visual temporal frequency preference shows a distinct cortical architecture using fMRI
Chai, Y., Handwerker, D. A., Marrett, S., Gonzalez-Castillo, J., Merriam, E. P., Hall, A., Molfese, P. J., & Bandettini, P. A. (2019) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.04.048 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
- Authors
- Morrone, M. C., Di Stefano, M., & Burr, D. C.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurophysiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 1986-10-01
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 969-986
- ISSN
- 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1598
- OpenAlex
- W2410145164
- Cited by
- 71
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 2.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Neurophysiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Florence Research (University of Florence) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Keywords
- cat visual cortex, spatial frequency selectivity, receptive field size, eccentricity dependence, contrast gain, contrast threshold, velocity tuning, motion detection
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Brain Mapping, Cats, Cerebral Cortex, Depth Perception, Motion Perception, Psychophysics, Visual Fields, Visual Perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review