Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 223

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Motor-unit responses in human wrist flexor and extensor muscles to transcranial cortical stimuli

Calancie, B., Nordin, M., Wallin, U., Hagbarth, K. E.·1987·Journal of Neurophysiology

Abstract

1. Transcranial cortical stimuli (TCCS) were used to elicit motor responses in contralateral wrist flexor and extensor muscles of healthy adult subjects. The motor responses were assessed by surface EMG recordings, by needle recordings of single motor-unit discharges, and by measurements of wrist twitch force. Our main aim was to analyze the single-unit events underlying those changes in latency, amplitude, and duration of the compound EMG responses, which could be induced by voluntary preactivation of target muscles and by changes in stimulation strength. 2. Different stimulus strengths were tested with and without background contractions in the flexor or extensor muscles. For each test (consisting of a series of 20 stimuli) the compound EMG responses were averaged and displayed together with the averaged wrist force signals. Responses of individual flexor and extensor motor units were displayed in raster diagrams and peristimulus time histograms. For units exhibiting a background firing, the mean background interdischarge interval was calculated and compared with the subsequent poststimulus intervals. 3. In relaxed muscles, a shortening of onset latency of evoked compound EMG responses was observed when raising stimulation strength. A similar latency reduction was not seen in any of the single-unit recordings. This would be consistent with the size principle of motoneuron recruitment. 4. A shortening of onset latency of evoked EMG potentials was observed also as a result of a voluntary preactivation. Such latency shifts, which were seen also in single-unit recordings, might be attributed to variations in the time required for D and I wave temporal summation at the anterior horn cell. 5. When raising stimulation strength or when adding voluntary background contraction, the evoked compound EMG potential grew not only in amplitude but also in duration, as later peaks of activity were added to the initial ones. Under optimal conditions (strong stimulus + background contraction), the period of excitation (termed E1) had an onset latency of approximately 15 ms and a duration of approximately 35 ms and was similar for wrist flexor and extensor muscles. 6. We never saw the same flexor or extensor unit fire more than once during the E1 period. For units preactivated by a background contraction, the stimulus-triggered impulse exhibited latency shifts, which, to a large extent, depended on the timing of the stimulus in relation to a preceding background discharge and which could be influenced by a change in stimulation strength.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/jn.1987.58.5.1168

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 223

Metadata

Authors
Calancie, B., Nordin, M., Wallin, U., & Hagbarth, K. E.
Venue
Journal of Neurophysiology
Published
1987-11-01
Volume
58
Issue
5
Pages
1168-1185
ISSN
  • 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1598
OpenAlex
W1949614844
Cited by
223
References
0
FWCI
46.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Motor-unit responses in human wrist flexor and extensor muscles to transcranial cortical stimuli. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/jn.1987.58.5.1168
The paper
Calancie, B., Nordin, M., Wallin, U., & Hagbarth, K. E. (1987). Motor-unit responses in human wrist flexor and extensor muscles to transcranial cortical stimuli. Journal of Neurophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1987.58.5.1168

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.