The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Coordination and inhomogeneous activation of human arm muscles during isometric torques
Abstract
1. In this study we have recorded the activity of motor units of the important muscles acting across the elbow joint during combinations of voluntary isometric torques in flexion/extension direction and supination/pronation direction at different angles of the elbow joint. 2. Most muscles are not activated homogeneously; instead the population of motor units of muscles can be subdivided into several subpopulations. Inhomogeneous activation of the population of motor units in a muscle is a general finding and is not restricted to some multifunctional muscles. 3. Muscles can be activated even if their mechanical action does not contribute directly to the external torque. For example, m. triceps is activated during supination torques and thus compensates for the flexion component of the m. biceps. On the other hand, motor units in muscles are not necessarily activated if their mechanical action contributes to a prescribed torque. For example, there are motor units in the m. biceps that are activated during flexion torques, but not during supination torques. 4. The relative activation of the muscles depends on the elbow angle. Changing the elbow angle affects the mechanical advantage of different muscles differently. In general, muscles with the larger mechanical advantage receive the larger input. 5. We have calculated the relative contributions of some muscles to isometric torques. These contributions depend on the combination of the torques exerted. 6. Existing theoretical models on muscle coordination do not incorporate subpopulations of motor units and therefore need to be amended.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Relation between size of neurons and their susceptibility to discharge
Henneman, E. (1957) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.126.3287.1345 · Cited by 1,227
Cited by
The mechanisms of muscle hypertrophy and their application to resistance training
Schoenfeld, B. J. (2010) · Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research · doi:10.1519/jsc.0b013e3181e840f3 · Cited by 1,214
Narici, M. V., Binzoni, T., Hiltbrand, E., Fasel, J., Terrier, F., & Cerretelli, P. (1996) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1996.sp021685 · Cited by 555
Heckman, C. J., & Enoka, R. M. (2012) · Comprehensive Physiology · doi:10.1002/cphy.c100087 · Cited by 414
What are “normal movements” in atypical populations?
Latash, M. L., & Anson, J. G. (1996) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00041467 · Cited by 331
On the function of muscle and reflex partitioning
Windhorst, U., Hamm, T. M., & Stuart, D. G. (1989) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00024985 · Cited by 182
Metadata
- Authors
- van Zuylen, E. J., Gielen, C. C., & Denier van der Gon, J. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurophysiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 1988-11-01
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1523-1548
- ISSN
- 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1598
- OpenAlex
- W2410939394
- Cited by
- 393
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 50.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Coordination and inhomogeneous activation of human arm muscles during isometric torques. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/jn.1988.60.5.1523
- The paper
- van Zuylen, E. J., Gielen, C. C., & Denier van der Gon, J. J. (1988). Coordination and inhomogeneous activation of human arm muscles during isometric torques. Journal of Neurophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1988.60.5.1523
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.