Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 340

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Spatiotemporal characteristics of 5-HT and dopamine-induced rhythmic hindlimb activity in the in vitro neonatal rat

Kiehn, O., Kjaerulff, O.·1996·Journal of Neurophysiology

Abstract

1. Rhythmic activity was induced with either serotonin (5-HT; 10-100 microM) or dopamine (0.1-1.0 mM), in the in vitro spinal cord preparation of neonatal rats, with one intact hindlimb attached. Patterns of activity were investigated with multiple EMG recordings and the spatiotemporal characteristics of 5-HT- and dopamine-induced activity compared. 2. Dopamine-induced rhythmic activity was slow (cycle duration: 2.2-70.1 s) and irregular, whereas rhythmic activity induced by 5-HT was fast (cycle duration: 1.3-5.1 s) and regular. 3. During 5-HT- and dopamine-induced rhythmic activity, the timing of muscular activity was similar for hip flexors and hip adductors, for semimembranosus (hip extensor), and for muscles controlling the ankle and the foot. 4. In contrast, notable differences in the phase in the pattern induced by 5-HT compared with that induced by dopamine were found in the biceps femoris, semitendinosus, and quadriceps muscles. Biceps femoris and semitendinosus (functional hip extensors and knee flexors) were always extensor-like during 5-HT-induced activity, whereas in dopamine, these muscles displayed flexor-like bursts and double bursts as well as extensor-like bursts. Lack of EMG activity in biceps femoris and semitendinosus was encountered also in dopamine. In rectus femoris, vastus lateralis, and vastus medialis (main function: knee extension), the activity was dominated by flexor-like bursts in 5-HT, whereas in dopamine the activity was shifted to a predominantly extensor-like pattern. 5. The relationship between flexor and extensor burst duration and cycle duration was more variable than described for locomotor activity in adult animals. 6. The relative timing of muscle activity was stable from P0 to P4. The most important difference between rats aged 0-1 days and rats aged 2-4 days was a delayed flexor-extensor transition in older animals. 7. The complex timing of hindlimb muscle activity was relatively unchanged after transecting all dorsal roots. 8. Finally, the relationship between flexor and extensor activity and ventral root discharges was determined. It was found that the L2 ventral root burst was in phase with simple flexors while the L5 burst coincide with the extensor phase. 9. We conclude, that 5-HT and dopamine can activate spinal central pattern generators (CPGs) that already at birth are able to produce distinct patterns of motor activity. Modulatory inputs thus seems to be able to reconfigure the CPGs to produce specific motor outputs.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/jn.1996.75.4.1472

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 340

Metadata

Authors
Kiehn, O., & Kjaerulff, O.
Venue
Journal of Neurophysiology
Published
1996-04-01
Volume
75
Issue
4
Pages
1472-1482
ISSN
  • 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1598
OpenAlex
W2128446220
Cited by
340
References
0
FWCI
5.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spatiotemporal characteristics of 5-HT and dopamine-induced rhythmic hindlimb activity in the in vitro neonatal rat. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/jn.1996.75.4.1472
The paper
Kiehn, O., & Kjaerulff, O. (1996). Spatiotemporal characteristics of 5-HT and dopamine-induced rhythmic hindlimb activity in the in vitro neonatal rat. Journal of Neurophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1996.75.4.1472

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.