Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 285

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Loop gain of reflexes controlling human standing measured with the use of postural and vestibular disturbances

Fitzpatrick, R., Burke, D., Gandevia, S. C.·1996·Journal of Neurophysiology

Abstract

1. In this study we measured the loop gain of postural reflexes in standing human subjects. Reflex activity is conventionally described in terms of the muscle activation arising from a perturbation, but in this study the ability of the evoked muscle activity to correct the perturbation was also measured, and the behavior of the entire feedback loop is described. 2. A weak continuous random perturbation was applied at waist level to standing subjects. The effects of the perturbation on body sway and soleus electromyogram (EMG) were identified by cross-correlation, and spectral analysis was used to estimate the open-loop reflex transmission characteristics (i.e., sway to EMG). Under the same conditions, activity in the leg muscles was evoked by galvanic vestibular stimulation with the use of a continuous randomly varying current. The effects on soleus EMG and the subsequent body sway were identified by cross-correlation. This allowed calculation of the open-loop muscle and load behavior (i.e., EMG to sway). From these open-loop reflex and muscle and load transfer functions, the loop gain and phase were calculated. 3. In addition to the gain of the feedback loop, the study describes the transmission characteristics of reflex responses in the leg muscles associated with body sway and the effects of excluding visual and proprioceptive contributions to the response; the transfer function of human soleus with a stimulus that preserves the normal recruitment of motoneurons, including the effects of different load conditions on the muscle; and the transmission characteristics of vestibular pathways that evoke responses in the leg muscles during standing in situations that might modify the reflexes. 4. When standing, the loop gain of reflex feedback is approximately unity and is unchanged by eye closure and stability of support. Reflex transmission introduced a marked phase advance, and this served to offset most of the phase lag introduced by muscle and load. The residual phase lag could explain the frequency of tremor observed during standing (6–8 Hz). 5. The gain of the feedback loop (approximately 1) is higher than suggested by both previous estimates and theoretical considerations, but is still insufficient to explain the stability of normal human standing. This implies that, although sensory information is used to control posture, it does not do so exclusively through a negative feedback control process. The experimental findings are consistent with a reflex response based on a feed-forward process, and this would result in prediction of the response necessary to counteract a postural disturbance.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/jn.1996.76.6.3994

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 285

Metadata

Authors
Fitzpatrick, R., Burke, D., & Gandevia, S. C.
Venue
Journal of Neurophysiology
Published
1996-12-01
Volume
76
Issue
6
Pages
3994-4008
ISSN
  • 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1598
OpenAlex
W2113222165
Cited by
285
References
0
FWCI
5.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Loop gain of reflexes controlling human standing measured with the use of postural and vestibular disturbances. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/jn.1996.76.6.3994
The paper
Fitzpatrick, R., Burke, D., & Gandevia, S. C. (1996). Loop gain of reflexes controlling human standing measured with the use of postural and vestibular disturbances. Journal of Neurophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1996.76.6.3994

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.