Cited by 113Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsIon Transport and Channel RegulationBarrier Structure and Function Studies

Evolution of anisotropic diffusion in the developing rat corpus callosum

Open access
Voříšek, Ivan, Syková, Eva·1997·Journal of Neurophysiology

Abstract

Diffusion anisotropy was investigated in the developing rat brain [postnatal day (P)6-29] with the use of ion-selective microelectrodes to measure the three-dimensional distribution of tetramethylammonium (TMA+) iontophoresed into the extracellular space (ECS). The diffusion parameters, ECS volume fraction alpha (alpha = ECS volume/total tissue volume), tortuosity lambda (lambda2 = apparent diffusion coefficient/free diffusion coefficient), and nonspecific TMA+ uptake (k'), were studied in cortical gray matter (layer V) and corpus callosum (CC) of anesthetized rats. ECS volume fraction in cortex and CC was about twice as large in the newborn rat as in adults. In this study, more detailed analysis revealed that alpha in CC gradually decreased from P4, when alpha ranged between 0.42 and 0.45, and reached a final value of 0.26 +/- 0.01 (SE, n = 12 measurements, 6 animals) at about P21. Diffusion in the ECS of CC was isotropic until about P12, i.e., there was no significant difference in the tortuosity factor, lambda, between the three perpendicular axes. From P13 to P17 anisotropy greatly increased as a result of preferential diffusion along the myelinated axons (X-axis). At P21-23 the tortuosity values were lambda(x) = 1.46 +/- 0.03, lambda(y) = 1.70 +/- 0.01, and lambda(z) = 1.72 +/- 0.02 (n = 12), and there were no further changes up to the last postnatal day studied, P29. In contrast to the myelinated CC, cortical gray matter remained isotropic up to P29, with a tortuosity o…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/jn.1997.78.2.912

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 34 · Cited by 113

Authors
Voříšek, I., & Syková, E.
Affiliations
Czech Academy of Sciences (CZ)
Venue
Journal of Neurophysiology
Published
1997-08-01
Volume
78
Issue
2
Pages
912-919
ISSN
  • 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1598
OpenAlex
W2116836284
Cited by
113
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
5.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Neurophysiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ion Transport and Channel Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Barrier Structure and Function Studies
Keywords
diffusion anisotropy, corpus callosum, extracellular space, tortuosity, myelination, postnatal brain development, cortical gray matter, volume transmission, diffusion-weighted imaging
MeSH terms
Quaternary Ammonium Compounds, Animals, Cerebral Cortex, Corpus Callosum, Diffusion, Ganglionic Stimulants, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Anisotropy, Rats, Wistar, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review