The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mosaic Arrangement of Ganglion Cell Receptive Fields in Rabbit Retina
Abstract
DeVries, Steven H. and Denis A. Baylor. Mosaic arrangement of ganglion cell receptive fields in rabbit retina. J. Neurophysiol. 78: 2048–2060, 1997. The arrangement of ganglion cell receptive fields on the retinal surface should constrain several properties of vision, including spatial resolution. Anatomic and physiological studies on the mammalian retina have shown that the receptive fields of several types of ganglion cells tile the retinal surface, with the degree of receptive field overlap apparently being similar for the different classes. It has been difficult to test the generality of this arrangement, however, because it is hard to sample many receptive fields in the same preparation with conventional single-unit recording. In our experiments, the response properties and receptive fields of up to 80 neighboring ganglion cells in the isolated rabbit retina were characterized simultaneously by recording with a multielectrode array. The cells were divided into 11 classes on the basis of their characteristic light responses and the temporal structures of their impulse trains. The mosaic arrangement of receptive fields for cells of a given class was examined after the spatial profile of each receptive field was fitted with a generalized Gaussian surface. For eight cell classes the mosaic arrangement was similar: the profiles of neighboring cells approached each other at the 1-σ border. Thus field centers were 2 σ apart. The layout of fields for the remaining three classes was not well characterized because the fields were poorly fitted by a single Gaussian or because the cells responded selectively to movement. The 2-σ center-center spacing may be a general principle of functional organization that minimizes spatial aliasing and confers a uniform spatial sensitivity on the ganglion cell population.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The contrast sensitivity of retinal ganglion cells of the cat
Enroth-Cugell, C., & Robson, J. G. (1966) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp008107 · Cited by 2,625
DISCHARGE PATTERNS AND FUNCTIONAL ORGANIZATION OF MAMMALIAN RETINA
Kuffler, S. W. (1953) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1953.16.1.37 · Cited by 2,609
Receptive fields and trigger features of ganglion cells in the visual streak of the rabbit's retina
Levick, W. R. (1967) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1967.sp008140 · Cited by 384
Cited by
The Neuronal Organization of the Retina
Masland, R. H. (2012) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2012.10.002 · Cited by 1,150
The functional diversity of retinal ganglion cells in the mouse
Baden, T., Berens, P., Franke, K., Román Rosón, M., Bethge, M., & Euler, T. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature16468 · Cited by 999
The Types of Retinal Ganglion Cells: Current Status and Implications for Neuronal Classification
Sanes, J. R., & Masland, R. H. (2015) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev-neuro-071714-034120 · Cited by 789
Design Principles of Insect and Vertebrate Visual Systems
Sanes, J. R., & Zipursky, S. L. (2010) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2010.01.018 · Cited by 561
Anticipation of moving stimuli by the retina
Berry, M. J., Brivanlou, I. H., Jordan, T. A., & Meister, M. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/18678 · Cited by 493
Metadata
- Authors
- Devries, S. H., & Baylor, D. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurophysiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 1997-10-01
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 2048-2060
- ISSN
- 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1598
- OpenAlex
- W1939828159
- Cited by
- 313
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 3.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mosaic Arrangement of Ganglion Cell Receptive Fields in Rabbit Retina. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/jn.1997.78.4.2048
- The paper
- Devries, S. H., & Baylor, D. A. (1997). Mosaic Arrangement of Ganglion Cell Receptive Fields in Rabbit Retina. Journal of Neurophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1997.78.4.2048
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.