The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Responses of Neurons in Inferior Temporal Cortex During Memory-Guided Visual Search
Abstract
Chelazzi, Leonardo, John Duncan, Earl K. Miller, and Robert Desimone. Responses of neurons in inferior temporal cortex during memory-guided visual search. J. Neurophysiol. 80: 2918–2940, 1998. A typical scene will contain many different objects, few of which are relevant to behavior at any given moment. Thus attentional mechanisms are needed to select relevant objects for visual processing and control over behavior. We examined this role of attention in the inferior temporal cortex of macaque monkeys, using a visual search paradigm. While the monkey maintained fixation, a cue stimulus was presented at the center of gaze, followed by a blank delay period. After the delay, an array of two to five choice stimuli was presented extrafoveally, and the monkey was rewarded for detecting a target stimulus matching the cue. The behavioral response was a saccadic eye movement to the target in one version of the task and a lever release in another. The array was composed of one “good” stimulus (effective in driving the cell when presented alone) and one or more “poor” stimuli (ineffective in driving the cell when presented alone). Most cells showed higher delay activity after a good stimulus used as the cue than after a poor stimulus. The baseline activity of cells was also higher preceding a good cue, if the animal expected it to occur. This activity may depend on a top-down bias in favor of cells coding the relevant stimulus. When the choice array was presented, most cells showed suppressive interactions between the stimuli as well as strong attention effects. When the choice array was presented in the contralateral visual field, most cells initially responded the same, regardless of which stimulus was the target. However, within 150–200 ms of array onset, responses were determined by the target stimulus. If the target was the good stimulus, the response to the array became equal to the response to the good stimulus presented alone. If the target was a poor stimulus, the response approached the response to that stimulus presented alone. Thus the influence of the nontarget stimulus was eliminated. These effects occurred well in advance of the behavioral response. When the array was positioned with stimuli on opposite sides of the vertical meridian, the contralateral stimulus appeared to dominate the response, and this dominant effect could not be overcome by attention. Overall, the results support a “biased competition” model of attention, according to which 1) objects in the visual field compete for representation in the cortex, and 2) this competition is biased in favor of the behaviorally relevant object by virtue of “top-down” feedback from structures involved in working memory.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Later in time, competition can be biased by top-down control—either by prioritizing a spatial location (Moran & Desimone, 1985) or the perceptual feature(s) summarized in an “attentional template” (Chelazzi, Duncan, Miller, & Desimone, 1998; Reynolds, Chelazzi, & Desimone, 1999).”
From Selection history: How reward modulates selectivity of visual attention. (2018) · cites this paper as Chelazzi, Duncan, Miller, & Desimone, 1998
Citations
Cites
A feature-integration theory of attention.
Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(80)90005-5 · Cited by 12,366
Neural Mechanisms of Selective Visual Attention
Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. (1995) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.18.030195.001205 · Cited by 8,388
Self-citationLane, S. D. (2016) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315506173-8 · Cited by 4,707
Visual search and stimulus similarity.
Duncan, J. S., & Humphreys, G. (1989) · Psychology Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.96.3.433 · Cited by 3,919
Self-citationSelective Attention Gates Visual Processing in the Extrastriate Cortex
Moran, J., & Desimone, R. (1985) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.4023713 · Cited by 2,433
Self-citationA Method of Measuring Eye Movemnent Using a Scieral Search Coil in a Magnetic Field
Robinson, D. A. (1963) · IEEE Transactions on Bio-medical Electronics · doi:10.1109/tbmel.1963.4322822 · Cited by 2,234
Selective Attention Gates Visual Processing in the Extrastriate Cortex
Moran, J., & Desimone, R. (2003) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/2834.003.0024 · Cited by 2,164
Self-citationGuided search: An alternative to the feature integration model for visual search.
Wolfe, J. M., Cave, K. R., & Franzel, S. L. (1989) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037//0096-1523.15.3.419 · Cited by 2,150
A method of measuring eye movements using a scleral search coil in a magnetic field
Robinson, D. A. (1963) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,709
Bundesen, C. (1990) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.97.4.523 · Cited by 1,693
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Reynolds J., 1994, Soc. Neurosci. Abstr., 20, 1054
- Reynolds J., 1997, Soc. Neurosci. Abstr., 23, 302
- Reynolds J., 1995, Soc. Neurosci. Abstr., 21, 1759
- Reynolds J., 1996, Soc. Neurosci. Abstr., 22, 1197
- 10.1037/0096-1523.16.3.459 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 725
The urgency to look: Prompt saccades to the benefit of perception
Montagnini, A., & Chelazzi, L. (2005) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/j.visres.2005.07.013 · Cited by 78
Self-citationSessa, P., Luria, R., Gotler, A., Jolicœur, P., & Dell’Acqua, R. (2010) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01046.x · Cited by 76
Object-based vision and attention in primates
Olson, C. R. (2001) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0959-4388(00)00193-8 · Cited by 71
Visual Attention for Robotic Cognition: A Survey
Begum, M., & Karray, F. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Autonomous Mental Development · doi:10.1109/tamd.2010.2096505 · Cited by 71
Molecular mechanisms of working memory
Khan, Z. U., & Muly, E. C. (2011) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2010.12.039 · Cited by 79
Frontal Eye Field Activity Enhances Object Identification During Covert Visual Search
Monosov, I. E., & Thompson, K. G. (2009) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00750.2009 · Cited by 68
Working Memory and Decision Processes in Visual Area V4
Hayden, B. Y., & Gallant, J. L. (2013) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2013.00018 · Cited by 73
Control without Controllers: Toward a Distributed Neuroscience of Executive Control
Eisenreich, B. R., Akaishi, R., & Hayden, B. Y. (2017) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_01139 · Cited by 79
Günseli, E., Meeter, M., & Olivers, C. N. L. (2014) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.05.012 · Cited by 77
Saccadic target selection as a function of time
van Zoest, W., & Donk, M. (2005) · Spatial Vision · doi:10.1163/156856806775009205 · Cited by 66
The reentry hypothesis: linking eye movements to visual perception
Hamker, F. H. (2003) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/3.11.14 · Cited by 67
Attention in hierarchical models of object recognition
Walther, D. B., & Koch, C. (2007) · Progress in brain research · doi:10.1016/s0079-6123(06)65005-x · Cited by 65
Attention during adaptation weakens negative afterimages.
Suzuki, S., & Grabowecky, M. (2003) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.29.4.793 · Cited by 66
A Neural Network Reflecting Decisions about Human Faces
Druzgal, T. J., & D’Esposito, M. (2001) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(01)00519-0 · Cited by 66
Effects of temporal context and temporal expectancy on neural activity in inferior temporal cortex
Anderson, B., & Sheinberg, D. L. (2008) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.11.025 · Cited by 65
A neuronal theory of sequential economic choice
Hayden, B. Y., & Moreno‐Bote, R. (2018) · Brain and Neuroscience Advances · doi:10.1177/2398212818766675 · Cited by 67
Differential Brain Mechanisms of Selection and Maintenance of Information during Working Memory
Quentin, R., King, J.-R., Sallard, E., Fishman, N. S., Thompson, R., Buch, E. R., & Cohen, L. G. (2019) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2764-18.2019 · Cited by 66
Involvement of prefrontal cortex in visual search
Anderson, E. J., Mannan, S., Husain, M., Rees, G. E., Sumner, P., Mort, D. J., McRobbie, D. W., & Kennard, C. (2007) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-007-0860-0 · Cited by 64
Soto, D., & Humphreys, G. W. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0510718103 · Cited by 64
Kamiński, J., Brzezicka, A., Mamelak, A. N., & Rutishauser, U. (2020) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2020.01.032 · Cited by 63
Nobre, A. C., Rao, A., & Chelazzi, L. (2006) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2006.18.4.539 · Cited by 59
Self-citationThe different stages of visual recognition need different attentional binding strategies
Tsotsos, J. K., Rodríguez-Sánchez, A. J., Rothenstein, A. L., & Simine, E. (2008) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2008.05.038 · Cited by 61
Automatic Selection of Irrelevant Object Features Through Working Memory
Soto, D., & Humphreys, G. W. (2009) · Experimental Psychology (formerly Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie) · doi:10.1027/1618-3169.56.3.165 · Cited by 62
Jacques, C., & Rossion, B. (2006) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhl015 · Cited by 61
Effect of target-distractor similarity on FEF visual selection in the absence of the target
Schall, J. D., Sato, T., Watanabe, K., & Thompson, K. G. (2003) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-003-1461-1 · Cited by 62
Combining spatial and feature-based attention within the receptive field of MT neurons
Patzwahl, D. R., & Treue, S. (2009) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/j.visres.2009.04.003 · Cited by 60
Multivariate EEG analyses support high-resolution tracking of feature-based attentional selection
Fahrenfort, J. J., Grubert, A., Olivers, C. N. L., & Martin Eimer, A. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-01911-0 · Cited by 57
Rollenhagen, J. E., & Olson, C. R. (2005) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00158.2005 · Cited by 59
Involvement of the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex of Monkeys in Visuospatial Target Selection
Iba, M., & Sawaguchi, T. (2003) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00148.2002 · Cited by 64
Search for a Category Target in Clutter
Bravo, M. J., & Farid, H. (2004) · Perception · doi:10.1068/p5244 · Cited by 57
Delay activity during visual working memory: A meta-analysis of 30 fMRI experiments
Li, X., O'Sullivan, M. J., & Mattingley, J. B. (2022) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119204 · Cited by 56
An expectation-based memory deficit in aging
Bollinger, J., Rubens, M. T., Masangkay, E., Kalkstein, J., & Gazzaley, A. H. (2011) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.12.021 · Cited by 56
Competition in Visual Cortex Impedes Attention to Multiple Items
Scalf, P. E., & Beck, D. M. (2010) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4207-09.2010 · Cited by 60
Neural Mechanisms of Surround Attenuation and Distractor Competition in Visual Search
Boehler, C. N., Tsotsos, J. K., Schoenfeld, M. A., Heinze, H., & Hopf, J. (2011) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.6406-10.2011 · Cited by 57
Associative memory properties of multiple cortical modules
Renart, A., Parga, N., & Rolls, E. T. (1999) · Network Computation in Neural Systems · doi:10.1088/0954-898x/10/3/303 · Cited by 56
Priority coding in the visual system
Rust, N. C., & Cohen, M. R. (2022) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41583-022-00582-9 · Cited by 59
Baeck, A., Wagemans, J. P., & de Beeck, H. O. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.12.023 · Cited by 55
Recognition and Memory for Briefly Presented Scenes
Potter, M. C. (2012) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00032 · Cited by 56
Position-specificity of facial adaptation
Kovács, G., Zimmer, M., Harza, I., Antal, A., & Vidnyánszky, Z. (2005) · Neuroreport · doi:10.1097/01.wnr.0000187635.76127.bc · Cited by 55
Modeling feature-based attention as an active top-down inference process
Hamker, F. H. (2006) · Biosystems · doi:10.1016/j.biosystems.2006.03.010 · Cited by 55
Neurophysiological bases of exponential sensory decay and top-down memory retrieval: a model
Zylberberg, A. (2009) · Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/neuro.10.004.2009 · Cited by 51
Attentional Guidance and Match Decisions Rely on Different Template Information During Visual Search
Yu, X., Hanks, T. D., & Geng, J. J. (2021) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/09567976211032225 · Cited by 53
Within-modality and cross-modality attentional blinks in a simple discrimination task
Hein, G., Parr, A., & Duncan, J. (2006) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03193655 · Cited by 51
Self-citationGrubert, A., & Martin Eimer, A. (2012) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/a0031046 · Cited by 52
On the time course of bottom‐up and top‐down processes in selective visual attention: An EEG study
Schneider, D. A., Beste, C., & Wascher, E. (2012) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2012.01462.x · Cited by 55
Papaioannou, O., & Luck, S. J. (2020) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/psyp.13532 · Cited by 52
Functions of delay-period activity in the prefrontal cortex and mnemonic scotomas revisited
Funahashi, S. (2015) · Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnsys.2015.00002 · Cited by 55
Bacon-Macé, N., Kirchner, H., Fabre‐Thorpe, M., & Thorpe, S. J. (2007) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.33.5.1013 · Cited by 51
Selecting and tracking multiple objects
Scimeca, J. M., & Franconeri, S. (2014) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Cognitive Science · doi:10.1002/wcs.1328 · Cited by 50
Renart, A., Moreno‐Bote, R., de la Rocha, J., Parga, N., & Rolls, E. T. (2001) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/s0925-2312(01)00548-3 · Cited by 49
Recognition by Top-Down and Bottom-Up Processing in Cortex: The Control of Selective Attention
Graboi, D., & Lisman, J. E. (2003) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00777.2002 · Cited by 51
Encoding of Target Detection during Visual Search by Single Neurons in the Human Brain
Wang, S., Mamelak, A. N., Adolphs, R., & Rutishauser, U. (2018) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2018.04.092 · Cited by 48
Relation-Attention Networks for Remote Sensing Scene Classification
Wang, X., Duan, L., Ning, C., & Zhou, H. (2021) · IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/jstars.2021.3135566 · Cited by 49
Synthetic Aperture Radar Image Change Detection via Layer Attention-Based Noise-Tolerant Network
Meng, D., Gao, F., Dong, J., Du, Q., & Li, H.-C. (2022) · IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters · doi:10.1109/lgrs.2022.3198088 · Cited by 48
Dynamic Construction of a Coherent Attentional State in a Prefrontal Cell Population
Kadohisa, M., Petrov, P., Stokes, M. G., Sigala, N., Buckley, M. J., Gaffan, D., Makoto Kusunoki, A., & Duncan, J. (2013) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2013.07.041 · Cited by 48
Self-citationDynamic interactions between visual working memory and saccade target selection
Schneegans, S., Spencer, J. P., Schöner, G., Hwang, S., & Hollingworth, A. (2014) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/14.11.9 · Cited by 48
Receptive field size-dependent attention effects in simultaneously presented stimulus displays
Bles, M., Schwarzbach, J. V., Weerd, P. D., Goebel, R., & Jansma, B. M. (2005) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.09.042 · Cited by 48
Ogawa, T., & Komatsu, H. (2006) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-006-0362-5 · Cited by 51
Galli, G., Feurra, M., & Viggiano, M. P. (2006) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2006.08.076 · Cited by 48
Computational Models of Object Recognition in Cortex: A Review
Riesenhuber, M., & Poggio, T. (2000) · Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC) · doi:10.21236/ada458109 · Cited by 51
Investigating the role of the superior colliculus in active vision with the visual search paradigm
Shen, K., Valero, J., Day, G. S., & Paré, M. (2011) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2011.07722.x · Cited by 48
Wykowska, A., & Schubö, A. (2009) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21390 · Cited by 48
Preparation for upcoming attentional states in the hippocampus and medial prefrontal cortex
Günseli, E., & Aly, M. (2020) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.53191 · Cited by 51
Ogawa, T., & Komatsu, H. (2010) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.01066.2009 · Cited by 49
Neural basis of visual selective attention
Chelazzi, L., Libera, C. D., Sani, I., & Santandrea, E. (2010) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Cognitive Science · doi:10.1002/wcs.117 · Cited by 45
Self-citationMonosov, I. E., Sheinberg, D. L., & Thompson, K. G. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1002870107 · Cited by 45
Mendoza-Halliday, D., Schneiderman, M., Kaul, C., & Martínez-Trujillo, J. (2011) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/11.1.11 · Cited by 46
The role of salience in localized attentional interference
Mounts, J. R. W., & Gavett, B. E. (2004) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/j.visres.2004.01.015 · Cited by 46
Simultaneous shape repulsion and global assimilation in the perception of aspect ratio
Sweeny, T. D., Grabowecky, M., & Suzuki, S. (2011) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/11.1.16 · Cited by 45
Sato, J., Mossad, S. I., Wong, S. M., Hunt, B. A. E., Dunkley, B. T., Smith, M. L., Urbain, C. M., & Taylor, M. J. (2018) · Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2018.09.001 · Cited by 54
Maioli, C., Benaglio, I., Siri, S., Sosta, K., & Cappa, S. F. (2001) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1046/j.1460-9568.2001.01381.x · Cited by 46
Spatial neglect and the neural coding of attentional priority
Ptak, R., & Fellrath, J. (2013) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.01.026 · Cited by 48
Keogh, R., & Pearson, J. (2020) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2019.0688 · Cited by 45
Steinschneider, M., Nourski, K. V., Rhone, A. E., Kawasaki, H., Oya, H., & Howard, M. A. (2014) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2014.00240 · Cited by 45
Peters, J. C., Roelfsema, P. R., & Goebel, R. (2012) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0591-12.2012 · Cited by 46
Effects of Search Difficulty on the Selection, Maintenance, and Learning of Attentional Templates
Günseli, E., Olivers, C. N. L., & Meeter, M. (2014) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00600 · Cited by 52
Working Memory in the Service of Executive Control Functions
Mansouri, F. A., Rosa, M. G. P., & Atapour, N. (2015) · Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnsys.2015.00166 · Cited by 49
Eimer, M. (2015) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17470218.2015.1065283 · Cited by 46
Pan, Y., & Soto, D. (2009) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/j.visres.2009.10.016 · Cited by 43
Failures to see: Attentive blank stares revealed by change blindness
Caplovitz, G. P., Fendrich, R., & Hughes, H. C. (2007) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2007.08.006 · Cited by 47
The prominent role of stimulus processing
Furey, M. L. (2011) · Current Opinion in Neurology · doi:10.1097/wco.0b013e328348bda5 · Cited by 42
Martin Eimer, A., Kiss, M., & Nicholas, S. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/a0024326 · Cited by 43
The Nature and Status of Visual Resources
Franconeri, S. (2013) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195376746.013.0010 · Cited by 45
Kaliukhovich, D. A., & Vogels, R. (2016) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2011-15.2016 · Cited by 44
Hermes, D., Rangarajan, V., Foster, B. L., King, J.-R., Kaşikçi, I., Miller, K. J., & Parvizi, J. (2015) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhv250 · Cited by 42
Dividing the mind: The necessary role of the frontal lobes in separating memory from search
Soto, D., Humphreys, G. W., & Heinke, D. G. (2006) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.01.029 · Cited by 43
Limits of Event-related Potential Differences in Tracking Object Processing Speed
Rousselet, G. A., Macé, M. J. ‐., Thorpe, S. J., & Fabre‐Thorpe, M. (2007) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2007.19.8.1241 · Cited by 42
How can temporal expectations bias perception and action?
Nobre, A. C. (2010) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199563456.003.0027 · Cited by 41
Theeuwes, J., & Failing, M. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108891288 · Cited by 50
Adaptive modulation of color salience contingent upon global form coding and task relevance
Goolsby, B. A., Grabowecky, M., & Suzuki, S. (2004) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/j.visres.2004.10.003 · Cited by 39
Feature-based attention and the suppression of non-relevant object features
Wegener, D., Ehn, F., Aurich, M. K., Galashan, F. O., & Kreiter, A. K. (2008) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/j.visres.2008.08.021 · Cited by 39
Guidance of attention to objects and locations by long-term memory of natural scenes.
Becker, M. W., & Rasmussen, I. P. (2008) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/a0013650 · Cited by 45
Preparatory attention incorporates contextual expectations
Gayet, S., & Peelen, M. V. (2021) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2021.11.062 · Cited by 39
Neural encoding of relative position.
Hayworth, K. J., Lescroart, M. D., & Biederman, I. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/a0022338 · Cited by 43
Cue-Guided Search: A Computational Model of Selective Attention
Lee, K., Buxton, H., & Feng, J. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks · doi:10.1109/tnn.2005.851787 · Cited by 39
Context and competition in the capture of visual attention
Hickey, C., & Theeuwes, J. (2011) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-011-0168-9 · Cited by 43
Biased competition through variations in amplitude of γ-oscillations
Zeitler, M., Fries, P., & Gielen, S. C. A. M. (2008) · Journal of Computational Neuroscience · doi:10.1007/s10827-007-0066-2 · Cited by 39
Frontotemporal coordination predicts working memory performance and its local neural signatures
Rezayat, E., Dehaqani, M. A., Clark, K., Bahmani, Z., Moore, T., & Noudoost, B. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-21151-1 · Cited by 40
More than meets the eye: The effect of planned fixations on scene representation
Intraub, H., Hoffman, J. E., Wetherhold, C. J., & Stoehs, S.-A. (2006) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03193699 · Cited by 38
The role of attention in the binding of surface features to locations
Hyun, J.-S., Woodman, G. F., & Luck, S. J. (2008) · Visual Cognition · doi:10.1080/13506280802113894 · Cited by 39
Metadata
- Authors
- Chelazzi, L., Duncan, J., Miller, E. K., & Desimone, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Verona (IT)
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Neurophysiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 1998-12-01
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2918-2940
- ISSN
- 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1598
- OpenAlex
- W2143532311
- Cited by
- 726
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 38 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 28
- FWCI
- 10.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Neurophysiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Keywords
- inferior temporal cortex, visual attention, biased competition model, top-down feedback, working memory, delay activity, object recognition, macaque, saccades
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Attention, Conditioning, Operant, Cues, Fixation, Ocular, Macaca mulatta, Male, Memory, Neurons, Photic Stimulation, Psychomotor Performance, Retina, Temporal Lobe, Visual Perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review