The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Studies on the Corticospinal Control of Human Walking. I. Responses to Focal Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of the Motor Cortex
Open accessAbstract
Capaday, Charles, Brigitte A. Lavoie, Hugues Barbeau, Cyril Schneider, and Mireille Bonnard. Studies on the corticospinal control of human walking. I. Responses to focal transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 81: 129–139, 1999. Experiments were done to determine the extent to which the corticospinal tract is linked with the segmental motor circuits controlling ankle flexors and extensors during human walking compared with voluntary motor tasks requiring attention to the level of motor activity. The motor cortex was activated transcranially using a focal magnetic stimulation coil. For each subject, the entire input-output (I-O) curve [i.e., the integral of the motor evoked-potential (MEP) versus stimulus strength] was measured during a prescribed tonic voluntary contraction of either the tibialis anterior (TA) or the soleus. Similarly, I-O curves were measured in the early part of the swing phase, or in the early part of the stance phase of walking. The I-O data points were fitted by the Boltzmann sigmoidal function, which accounted for ≥80% of total data variance. There was no statistically significant difference between the I-O curves of the TA measured during voluntary ankle dorsiflexion or during the swing phase of walking, at matched levels of background electromyographic (EMG) activity. Additionally, there was no significant difference in the relation between the coefficient of variation and the amplitude of the MEPs measured in each task, respectively. In comparison, during the stance phase of walking the soleus MEPs were reduced on average by 26% compared with their size during voluntary ankle plantarflexion. Furthermore, during stance the MEPs in the inactive TA were enhanced relative to their size during voluntary ankle plantarflexion and in four of six subjects the TA MEPs were larger than those of the soleus. Finally, stimulation of the motor cortex at various phases of the step cycle did not reset the cycle. The time of the next step occurred at the expected moment, as determined from the phase-resetting curve. One interpretation of this result is that the motor cortex may not be part of the central neural system involved in timing the motor bursts during the step cycle. We suggest that during walking the corticospinal tract is more closely linked with the segmental motor circuits controlling the flexor, TA, than it is with those controlling the extensor, soleus. However, during voluntary tasks requiring attention to the level of motor activity, it is equally linked with the segmental motor circuits of ankle flexors or extensors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
HINDLIMB MUSCLE FIBER POPULATIONS OF FIVE MAMMALS
ARIANO, M. A., EDGERTON, V. R., & ARMSTRONG, R. B. (1973) · Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry · doi:10.1177/21.1.51 · Cited by 1,129
Input-output properties and gain changes in the human corticospinal pathway
Devanne, H., Lavoie, B. A., & Capaday, C. (1997) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/pl00005641 · Cited by 819
Self-citationTechniques and mechanisms of action of transcranial stimulation of the human motor cortex
Rothwell, J. C. (1997) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/s0165-0270(97)02242-5 · Cited by 646
DIFFERENT TYPES OF DISTURBED MOTOR CONTROL IN GAIT OF HEMIPARETIC PATIENTS
KNUTSSON, E., & RICHARDS, C. (1979) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/102.2.405 · Cited by 526
Motor Pattern Production in Reciprocally Inhibitory Neurons Exhibiting Postinhibitory Rebound
Perkel, D. H., & Mulloney, B. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4146.181 · Cited by 347
Phase-dependent reflex reversal in human leg muscles during walking
Yang, J. F., & Stein, R. B. (1990) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1990.63.5.1109 · Cited by 323
The effect of different descending systems on flexor and extensor activity during locomotion
Orlovsky, G. N. (1972) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0006-8993(72)90139-4 · Cited by 305
Roick, H., von Giesen, H. J., & Benecke, R. (1993) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/bf00230207 · Cited by 301
The modulation of human reflexes during functional motor tasks
Stein, R. B., & Capaday, C. (1988) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/0166-2236(88)90097-5 · Cited by 291
Self-citationDrew, T. (1993) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1993.70.1.179 · Cited by 285
Cited by
Modulation of human corticomotor excitability by somatosensory input
Kaelin‐Lang, A., Luft, A. R., Sawaki, L., Burstein, A. H., Sohn, Y. H., & Cohen, L. G. (2002) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2001.012801 · Cited by 423
Bretzner, F., & Drew, T. (2005) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.01245.2004 · Cited by 80
Wischnewski, M., Zerr, P., & Schutter, D. J. L. G. (2016) · Brain Stimulation · doi:10.1016/j.brs.2016.04.011 · Cited by 62
Metadata
- Authors
- Capaday, C., Lavoie, B. A., Barbeau, H., Schneider, C., & Bonnard, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurophysiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 1999-01-01
- Volume
- 81
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 129-139
- ISSN
- 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1598
- OpenAlex
- W1826908028
- Cited by
- 342
- References
- 26
- FWCI
- 3.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Studies on the Corticospinal Control of Human Walking. I. Responses to Focal Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of the Motor Cortex. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/jn.1999.81.1.129
- The paper
- Capaday, C., Lavoie, B. A., Barbeau, H., Schneider, C., & Bonnard, M. (1999). Studies on the Corticospinal Control of Human Walking. I. Responses to Focal Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of the Motor Cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1999.81.1.129
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.