Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 340

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Turning Strategies During Human Walking

Hase, K., Stein, R. B.·1999·Journal of Neurophysiology

Abstract

Turning strategies during human walking. The mechanisms involved in rapidly turning during human walking were studied. Subjects were asked to walk at a comfortable speed and to turn toward the instructed direction as soon as they felt an electrical stimulus to the superficial peroneal nerve. Stimuli were presented repeatedly at random over 10- to 15-min periods of walking for turning in both directions. Electromyograms (EMGs), joint angular movements of the right leg, and forces under both feet were recorded. The step cycle was divided into 16 parts, and the responses to stimuli in each part were analyzed separately. Two turning strategies were used, depending on which leg was placed in front for braking. For example, to turn to the right when the right foot was placed in front, subjects generally altered direction by spinning the body around the right foot (spin turn). To turn left when the right foot was in front, subjects shifted weight to the right leg, externally rotated the left hip, stepped onto the left leg, and continued turning until the right leg stepped in the new direction (step turn). The step turn is easy and stable because the base of support during the turn is much wider than in the spin turn, so some subjects used it in all parts of the cycle. Initially, the deceleration of walking is similar to a rapid stopping task, which has been previously examined. The deceleration mechanism involves a sequence of distal-to-proximal activation of muscles on one side of the body (soleus, biceps femoris, and erector spinae). This pattern is similar to the “ankle strategy” used in postural control during forward sway. The control of foot placement in the swing leg and muscle activities for rotating the trunk in the stance leg occurred within a step after the cue. The action of ankle inverters and elevation of the pelvis by activity of gluteus medius may contribute to the control of trunk rotation. This activity was closely related to the timing of the opposite foot strike, independent of the part of the step cycle when the stimulus was applied. In most subjects, the turn was completed without resetting the underlying walking rhythm. This first EMG analysis of rapid turning shows how common strategies for postural sway and stopping can be combined with one of two turning strategies. This simplifies the complex task of turning at a random time in the step cycle.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/jn.1999.81.6.2914

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 340

Metadata

Authors
Hase, K., & Stein, R. B.
Venue
Journal of Neurophysiology
Published
1999-06-01
Volume
81
Issue
6
Pages
2914-2922
ISSN
  • 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1598
OpenAlex
W2213233360
Cited by
340
References
0
FWCI
5.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Turning Strategies During Human Walking. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/jn.1999.81.6.2914
The paper
Hase, K., & Stein, R. B. (1999). Turning Strategies During Human Walking. Journal of Neurophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1999.81.6.2914

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.