The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Locomotor Strategy for Pedaling: Muscle Groups and Biomechanical Functions
Abstract
A group of coexcited muscles alternating with another group is a common element of motor control, including locomotor pattern generation. This study used computer simulation to investigate human pedaling with each muscle assigned at times to a group. Simulations were generated by applying patterns of muscle excitations to a musculoskeletal model that includes the dynamic properties of the muscles, the limb segments, and the crank load. Raasch et al. showed that electromyograms, pedal reaction forces, and limb and crank kinematics recorded during maximum-speed start-up pedaling could be replicated with two signals controlling the excitation of four muscle groups (1 group alternating with another to form a pair). Here a four-muscle-group control also is shown to replicate steady pedaling. However, simulations show that three signals controlling six muscle groups (i.e., 3 pairs) is much more biomechanically robust, such that a wide variety of forward and backward pedaling tasks can be executed well. We found the biomechanical functions necessary for pedaling, and how these functions can be executed by the muscle groups. Specifically, the phasing of two pairs with respect to limb extension and flexion and the transitions between extension and flexion do not change with pedaling direction. One pair of groups (uniarticular hip and knee extensors alternating with their anatomic antagonists) generates the energy required for limb and crank propulsion during limb extension and flexion, respectively. In the second pair, the ankle plantarflexors transfer the energy from the limb inertia to the crank during the latter part of limb extension and the subsequent limb extension-to-flexion transition. The dorsiflexors alternate with the plantarflexors. The phasing of the third pair (the biarticular thigh muscles) reverses with pedaling direction. In forward pedaling, the hamstring is excited during the extension-to-flexion transition and in backward pedaling during the opposite transition. In both cases hamstrings propel the crank posteriorly through the transition. Rectus femoris alternates with hamstrings and propels the crank anteriorly through the transitions. With three control signals, one for each pair of groups, different cadences (or power outputs) can be achieved by adjusting the overall excitatory drive to the pattern generating elements, and different pedaling goals (e.g., smooth, or energy-efficient pedaling; 1- or 2-legged pedaling) by adjusting the relative excitation levels among the muscle groups. These six muscle groups are suggested to be elements of a general strategy for pedaling control, which may be generally applicable to other human locomotor tasks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Plum, F. (1960) · Archives of Neurology · doi:10.1001/archneur.1960.03840090124020 · Cited by 10,364
The co-ordination and regulation of movements
(1969) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0006-8993(69)90278-9 · Cited by 5,043
Taussig, M. (2012) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203397244 · Cited by 2,532
Central programming of postural movements: adaptation to altered support-surface configurations
Horak, F. B., & Nashner, L. M. (1986) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1986.55.6.1369 · Cited by 2,435
Textbook of Work Physiology: Physiological Bases of Exercise
(2004) · Physiotherapy Theory and Practice · doi:10.1080/09593980490425012 · Cited by 1,886
Locomotion in vertebrates: central mechanisms and reflex interaction
Grillner, S. (1975) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.1975.55.2.247 · Cited by 1,448
Control of Locomotion in Bipeds, Tetrapods, and Fish
Grillner, S. (1981) · Comprehensive Physiology · doi:10.1002/cphy.cp010226 · Cited by 1,365
The organization of human postural movements: A formal basis and experimental synthesis
Nashner, L. M., & McCollum, G. (1985) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00020008 · Cited by 1,265
Neurophysiology of locomotor automatism
Shik, M. L., & Orlovsky, G. N. (1976) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.1976.56.3.465 · Cited by 1,068
On the central generation of locomotion in the low spinal cat
Grillner, S., & Zangger, P. (1979) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/bf00235671 · Cited by 838
Cited by
OpenSim: Open-Source Software to Create and Analyze Dynamic Simulations of Movement
Delp, S. L., Anderson, F. C., Arnold, A. S., Loan, P., Habib, A., John, C. T., Guendelman, E., & Thelen, D. G. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2007.901024 · Cited by 4,933
Biomechanics and muscle coordination of human walking
Zajac, F. E., Neptune, R. R., & Kautz, S. A. (2002) · Gait & Posture · doi:10.1016/s0966-6362(02)00068-1 · Cited by 615
Self-citationThe case for and against muscle synergies
Tresch, M. C., & Jarc, A. (2009) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2009.09.002 · Cited by 564
Neuromechanics of muscle synergies for posture and movement
Ting, L. H., & McKay, J. L. (2007) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2008.01.002 · Cited by 514
Muscle Synergy Organization Is Robust Across a Variety of Postural Perturbations
Torres-Oviedo, G., Macpherson, J. M., & Ting, L. H. (2006) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00810.2005 · Cited by 490
Metadata
- Authors
- Raasch, C. C., & Zajac, F. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurophysiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 1999-08-01
- Volume
- 82
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 515-525
- ISSN
- 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1598
- OpenAlex
- W1848976532
- Cited by
- 281
- References
- 62
- FWCI
- 3.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Locomotor Strategy for Pedaling: Muscle Groups and Biomechanical Functions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/jn.1999.82.2.515
- The paper
- Raasch, C. C., & Zajac, F. E. (1999). Locomotor Strategy for Pedaling: Muscle Groups and Biomechanical Functions. Journal of Neurophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1999.82.2.515
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.