Cited by 188Visual perception and processing mechanismsVisual Attention and Saliency DetectionNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Local Infusion of Scopolamine Into Intraparietal Cortex Slows Covert Orienting in Rhesus Monkeys

Davidson, M. C., Marrocco, R. T.·2000·Journal of Neurophysiology

Abstract

There is accumulating evidence to suggest that cholinergic neurotransmission may play an important role in visuospatial attention, but the brain sites at which acetylcholine modulates attention are not well understood. The present work tested the hypothesis that the cholinergic influences within the intraparietal cortex are necessary for normal attentional shifting (covert orienting) in nonhuman primates. Two rhesus monkeys were trained to perform a visual, cued target detection task for liquid reinforcement. The animals pressed a lever to produce a visual display in which a central fixation point was flanked by two circles. Shortly after fixation was established, one of the circles brightened (cue), and a target appeared subsequently within one of the circles. Detection was signaled by a manual response and the reaction time to the appearance of the target was recorded. Four types of trials were presented. For valid cue trials, the cue and target were at the same spatial location; for invalid cues, cue and target were in opposite hemifields; for double cues, both cues were brightened but the target appeared in either the left or right circle; in no-cue trials, the cue was omitted. We localized the intraparietal region by recording attention-related, cellular activity with intracerebral microelectrodes. Among visually responsive cells in this area, valid cues presented to the receptive fields of visual neurons enhanced the responses to target stimuli in about half the cells and inhibited those responses in the remainder. In addition, some cells showed longer response latencies to invalid cues than to valid cues. We then infused scopolamine into attention-related activity sites and assessed its effect on performance. Scopolamine produced a dose-dependent increase in reaction times and decrease in performance accuracy that lasted more than 1 h. Neither vehicle injections in the same locations nor scopolamine outside the physiologically defined area produced any significant change in behavior. Under our conditions of measurement, we conclude that activity mediated by muscarinic cholinergic receptors within the intraparietal cortex is necessary for normal covert orienting.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/jn.2000.83.3.1536

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The conceptualization of cholinergic transients in terms of mediating attentional orienting is consistent with the finding that cholinergic lesions or systemic or local cortical blockade of mAChRs impair attentional orienting.

    “The conceptualization of cholinergic transients in terms of mediating attentional orienting is consistent with the finding that cholinergic lesions or systemic or local cortical blockade of mAChRs impair attentional orienting (Davidson & Marrocco, 2000; Davidson et al, 1999; Chiba et al, 1999; Phillips et al, 2000).”

    From Modes and models of forebrain cholinergic neuromodulation of cognition (2011) · cites this paper as Davidson & Marrocco, 2000

  • Blockade of mAChR in the intraparietal cortex impairs performance in a cued target detection task.

    “Using a cued target detection task, Davidson and Marrocco found that blockade of mAChR in the intraparietal cortex impaired performance (Davidson and Marrocco, 2000).”

    From Modes and models of forebrain cholinergic neuromodulation of cognition (2011) · cites this paper as Davidson and Marrocco, 2000

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 57 · Cited by 188

Authors
Davidson, M. C., & Marrocco, R. T.
Affiliations
University of Oregon (US)
Venue
Journal of Neurophysiology
Published
2000-03-01
Volume
83
Issue
3
Pages
1536-1549
ISSN
  • 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1598
OpenAlex
W1900810162
Cited by
188
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 12
FWCI
2.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neurophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01ns032973-03)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS-32973)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
scopolamine, intraparietal cortex, covert orienting, visuospatial attention, cholinergic neurotransmission, acetylcholine, muscarinic receptors, attentional shift, rhesus monkeys, reaction time, target detection
MeSH terms
Animals, Cues, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Electrophysiology, Female, Fixation, Ocular, Injections, Macaca mulatta, Neurons, Orientation, Parietal Lobe, Reaction Time, Scopolamine, Visual Fields, Muscarinic Antagonists

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review