The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Texture Segregation in the Human Visual Cortex: A Functional MRI Study
Abstract
The segregation of visual scenes based on contour information is a fundamental process of early vision. Contours can be defined by simple cues, such as luminance, as well as by more complex cues, such as texture. Single-cell recording studies in monkeys suggest that the neural processing of complex contours starts as early as primary visual cortex. Additionally, lesion studies in monkeys indicate an important contribution of higher order areas to these processes. Using functional MRI, we have investigated the level at which neural correlates of texture segregation can be found in the human visual cortex. Activity evoked by line textures, with and without texture-defined boundaries, was compared in five healthy subjects. Areas V1, V2/VP, V4, TEO, and V3A were activated by both kinds of line textures as compared with blank presentations. Textures with boundaries forming a checkerboard pattern, relative to uniform textures, evoked significantly more activity in areas V4, TEO, less reliably in V3A, but not in V1 or V2/VP. These results provide evidence that higher order areas with large receptive fields play an important role in the segregation of visual scenes based on texture-defined boundaries.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kastner, S., Pinsk, M. A., De Weerd, P., Desimone, R., & Ungerleider, L. G. (1999) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80734-5 · Cited by 1,622
Self-citationPuce, A., Allison, T., Asgari, M., Gore, J. C., & McCarthy, G. (1996) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.16-16-05205.1996 · Cited by 987 · cited 2×
“Activations evoked by line textures, which have been shown to activate ventral occipitotemporal areas (Beason-Held et al. 1998; Gulyas et al. 1998; Puce et al. 1996), were studied when presented as uniform textures compared with segregated textures containing boundaries that formed a checkerboard…”
BackgroundThe neurophysiology of figure-ground segregation in primary visual cortex
Lamme, V. (1995) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.15-02-01605.1995 · Cited by 946
Cortical feedback improves discrimination between figure and background by V1, V2 and V3 neurons
Hupé, J. M., James, A. C., Payne, B. R., Lomber, S. G., Girard, P., & Bullier, J. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/29537 · Cited by 864
Cited by
Snakes as agents of evolutionary change in primate brains
Isbell, L. A. (2006) · Journal of Human Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2005.12.012 · Cited by 451
Cross-modal plasticity for the spatial processing of sounds in visually deprived subjects
Collignon, O., Voss, P., Lassonde, M., & Lepore, F. (2009) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-008-1553-z · Cited by 286
Functional Imaging of the Human Lateral Geniculate Nucleus and Pulvinar
Kastner, S., O'Connor, D. H., Fukui, M. M., Fehd, H. M., Herwig, U., & Pinsk, M. A. (2004) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00553.2003 · Cited by 228
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Kastner, S., De Weerd, P., & Ungerleider, L. G.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurophysiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 2000-04-01
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 2453-2457
- ISSN
- 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1598
- OpenAlex
- W2118349036
- Cited by
- 180
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 4.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Texture Segregation in the Human Visual Cortex: A Functional MRI Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/jn.2000.83.4.2453
- The paper
- Kastner, S., De Weerd, P., & Ungerleider, L. G. (2000). Texture Segregation in the Human Visual Cortex: A Functional MRI Study. Journal of Neurophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.2000.83.4.2453
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.