Synaptic Background Activity Enhances the Responsiveness of Neocortical Pyramidal Neurons
Abstract
Neocortical pyramidal neurons in vivo are subject to an intense synaptic background activity but little is known of how this activity affects cellular responsiveness and what function it may serve. These issues were examined in morphologically reconstructed neocortical pyramidal neurons in which synaptic background activity was simulated based on recent measurements in cat parietal cortex. We show that background activity can be decomposed into two components: a tonically active conductance and voltage fluctuations. Previous studies have mostly focused on the conductance effect, revealing that background activity is responsible for a decrease in responsiveness, which imposes severe conditions of coincidence of inputs necessary to discharge the cell. It is shown here, in contrast, that responsiveness is enhanced if voltage fluctuations are taken into account; in this case the model can produce responses to inputs that would normally be subthreshold. This effect is analyzed by dissecting and comparing the different components of background activity, as well as by evaluating the contribution of parameters such as the dendritic morphology, the distribution of leak currents, the value of axial resistivity, the densities of voltage-dependent currents, and the release parameters underlying background activity. Interestingly, the model's optimal responsiveness was obtained when voltage fluctuations were of the same order as those measured intracellularly in vivo. Possible consequences were also investigated at the population level, where the presence of background activity allowed networks of pyramidal neurons to instantaneously detect inputs that are small compared with the classical detection threshold. These results suggest, at the single-cell level, that the presence of voltage fluctuations has a determining influence on cellular responsiveness and that these should be taken into account in models of background activity. At the network level, we predict that background activity provides the necessary drive for detecting events that would normally be undetectable. Experiments are suggested to explore this possible functional role for background activity.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Changes in the level of synaptically driven fluctuations in membrane potential may regulate the gain of the I/O curve for individual neurons.
“Changes in the level of synaptically driven fluctuations in Vm (also called synaptic fluctuations or synaptic noise) may regulate the gain of the I/O curve for individual neurons57–60 (but see REF.61).”
From Mechanisms underlying gain modulation in the cortex (2020) · cites this paper as [58]
Unlike synaptically driven Vm fluctuations, changes in membrane conductance and depolarization cause lateral, or additive, shifts in the I/O transfer function of a neuron without changes in neuronal gain.
“Unlike synaptically driven Vm fluctuations, changes in membrane conductance and depolarization cause lateral, or additive, shifts in the I/O transfer function of a neuron without changes in neuronal gain57,58,60,61,83,84.”
From Mechanisms underlying gain modulation in the cortex (2020) · cites this paper as [58]
Temporally coincident changes in conductance state and synaptic fluctuations exert a powerful effect on neuronal gain at the single-cell level.
“Together, temporally coincident changes in conductance state and synaptic fluctuations exert a powerful effect on neuronal gain at the single-cell level57,58,60,61,83,84.”
From Mechanisms underlying gain modulation in the cortex (2020) · cites this paper as [58]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 36 · Cited by 281
- Authors
- Hô, N., & Destexhe, A.
- Affiliations
- Université Laval (CA)
- Department of Physiology and
- Venue
- Journal of Neurophysiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 2000-09-01
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1488-1496
- ISSN
- 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1598
- OpenAlex
- W1859669881
- Cited by
- 281
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 8.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Neurophysiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5r01ns037711-03)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01-NS37711)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › stochastic dynamics and bifurcation
- Keywords
- neocortical pyramidal neurons, neuronal responsiveness, voltage fluctuation, dendritic morphology, leakage current, voltage-dependent currents, coincidence detection, detection threshold, neuronal network model
- MeSH terms
- Action Potentials, Animals, Cats, Computer Simulation, Models, Neurological, Synaptic Transmission, Parietal Lobe, Predictive Value of Tests, Sensory Thresholds, Synapses, Reproducibility of Results, Neural Networks, Computer, Pyramidal Cells, alpha-Amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic Acid, Neocortex
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review