Target Selection for Saccadic Eye Movements: Prelude Activity in the Superior Colliculus During a Direction-Discrimination Task
Abstract
We investigated the role of the superior colliculus (SC) in saccade target selection while macaque monkeys performed a direction-discrimination task. The monkeys selected one of two possible saccade targets based on the direction of motion in a stochastic random-dot display; the difficulty of the task was varied by adjusting the strength of the motion signal in the display. One of the two saccade targets was positioned within the movement field of the SC neuron under study while the other target was positioned well outside the movement field. Approximately 30% of the neurons in the intermediate and deep layers of the SC discharged target-specific preludes of activity that “predicted” target choices well before execution of the saccadic eye movement. Across the population of neurons, the strength of the motion signal in the display influenced the intensity of this “predictive” prelude activity: SC activity signaled the impending saccade more reliably when the motion signal was strong than when it was weak. The dependence of neural activity on motion strength could not be explained by small variations in the metrics of the saccadic eye movements. Predictive activity was particularly strong in a subpopulation of neurons with directional visual responses that we have described previously. For a subset of SC neurons, therefore, prelude activity reflects the difficulty of the direction discrimination in addition to the target of the impending saccade. These results are consistent with the notion that a restricted network of SC neurons plays a role in the process of saccade target selection.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
It is likely that similar accumulations will be evident in other brain structures that participate in eye movement planning, allocation of attention, and working memory.
“It is likely that similar”
From Response of Neurons in the Lateral Intraparietal Area during a Combined Visual Discrimination Reaction Time Task (2002) · cites this paper as Horwitz and Newsome, 2001
Streak index analysis showed randomness of local spike count fluctuations with close to zero mean (0.06 ± 1.36, mean ± SD).
“streak index analysis (52) performed on a trial-by-trial basis (53) (SI Appendix, Fig. S10D, Materials and Methods), that showed randomness of local spike count fluctuations with close to zero mean (0.06 ± 1.36, mean ± SD, Fig. 4K)”
From Neural correlates of perceptual decision-making in the primary somatosensory cortex (2026) · cites this paper as [52]
Several other brain structures such as the superior colliculus, the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (Walker area 46), and the FEF are thought to represent quantities like the accumulated evidence in area LIP.
“Several other brain structures such as the superior colliculus, the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (Walker area 46), and the FEF are thought to represent quantities like the accumulated evidence in area LIP2,10,11,34–37”
From Microstimulation of macaque area LIP affects decision-making in a motion discrimination task (2006) · cites this paper as [36]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 29 · Cited by 168
- Authors
- Horwitz, G. D., & Newsome, W. T.
- Affiliations
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Neurophysiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 2001-11-01
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 2543-2558
- ISSN
- 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1598
- OpenAlex
- W2397708604
- Cited by
- 168
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 5.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Neurophysiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (MH17047, T32MH017047)
- National Eye Institute (EY 05603)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
- Keywords
- saccades, saccade target selection, superior colliculus, direction discrimination, random dot motion, macaque
- MeSH terms
- Action Potentials, Animals, Behavior, Animal, Choice Behavior, Discrimination, Psychological, Macaca mulatta, Neurons, Saccades, Space Perception, Superior Colliculi, Visual Perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review