Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 265

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Neural Representations of Sinusoidal Amplitude and Frequency Modulations in the Primary Auditory Cortex of Awake Primates

Liang, Li, Lu, Thomas, Wang, Xiaoqin·2002·Journal of Neurophysiology

Abstract

We investigated neural coding of sinusoidally modulated tones (sAM and sFM) in the primary auditory cortex (A1) of awake marmoset monkeys, demonstrating that there are systematic cortical representations of embedded temporal features that are based on both average discharge rate and stimulus-synchronized discharge patterns. The rate-representation appears to be coded alongside the stimulus-synchronized discharges, such that the auditory cortex has access to both rate and temporal representations of the stimulus at high and low frequencies, respectively. Furthermore, we showed that individual auditory cortical neurons, as well as populations of neurons, have common features in their responses to both sAM and sFM stimuli. These results may explain the similarities in the perception of sAM and sFM stimuli as well as the different perceptual qualities effected by different modulation frequencies. The main findings include the following. 1) Responses of cortical neurons to sAM and sFM stimuli in awake marmosets were generally much stronger than responses to unmodulated tones. Some neurons responded to sAM or sFM stimuli but not to pure tones. 2) The discharge rate-based modulation transfer function typically had a band-pass shape and was centered at a preferred modulation frequency (rBMF). Population-averaged mean firing rate peaked at 16- to 32-Hz modulation frequency, indicating that the A1 was maximally excited by this frequency range of temporal modulations. 3) Only approximately 60% of recorded units showed statistically significant discharge synchrony to the modulation waveform of sAM or sFM stimuli. The discharge synchrony-based best modulation frequency (tBMF) was typically lower than the rBMF measured from the same neuron. The distribution of rBMF over the population of neurons was approximately one octave higher than the distribution of tBMF. 4) There was a high degree of similarity between cortical responses to sAM and sFM stimuli that was reflected in both discharge rate- or synchrony-based response measures. 5) Inhibition appeared to be a contributing factor in limiting responses at modulation frequencies above the rBMF of a neuron. And 6) neurons with shorter response latencies tended to have higher tBMF and maximum discharge synchrony frequency than those with longer response latencies. rBMF was not significantly correlated with the minimum response latency.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/jn.2002.87.5.2237

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 265

Metadata

Authors
Liang, L., Lu, T., & Wang, X.
Venue
Journal of Neurophysiology
Published
2002-05-01
Volume
87
Issue
5
Pages
2237-2261
ISSN
  • 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1598
OpenAlex
W2339267114
Cited by
265
References
0
FWCI
4.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neural Representations of Sinusoidal Amplitude and Frequency Modulations in the Primary Auditory Cortex of Awake Primates. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/jn.2002.87.5.2237
The paper
Liang, L., Lu, T., & Wang, X. (2002). Neural Representations of Sinusoidal Amplitude and Frequency Modulations in the Primary Auditory Cortex of Awake Primates. Journal of Neurophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.2002.87.5.2237

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.