The DOI matches its Crossref record; 67 of the 67 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Control of Foot Trajectory in Human Locomotion: Role of Ground Contact Forces in Simulated Reduced Gravity
Abstract
We studied the changes of vertical contact forces, lower limb kinematics, and electromyographic activity (EMG) at different speeds and gravitational loads. To this end healthy subjects were asked to walk on a motorized treadmill while the percentage of body weight unloaded (body weight support, BWS) was modified in steps by means of a well-characterized unloading system. BWS was set at 0, 35, 50, 75, 95, or 100% of body weight. Walking speed was 0.7, 1.1, 2, 3, or 5 km/h. We found that changing BWS between 0 and 95% resulted in drastic changes of kinetic parameters but in limited changes of the kinematic coordination. In particular, the peak vertical contact forces decreased proportionally to BWS; at 95%-BWS they were 20-fold smaller than at 0% and were applied at the forefoot only. Also, there were considerable changes of the amplitude of EMG activity of all tested lower limb muscles and a complex re-organization of the pattern of activity of thigh muscles. By contrast, the corresponding variation of the parameters that describe shape and variability of the foot path was very limited, always <30% of the corresponding values at 0 BWS. Moreover, the planar co-variation of the elevation angles was obeyed at all speed and BWS values. Minimum variance of limb trajectory occurred at 3 km/h. At 100% BWS, subjects stepped in the air, their feet oscillating back and forth just above but never contacting the treadmill. In this case, step-to-step variability of foot path was much greater than at all other BWS levels but was restored to lower values when minimal surrogate contact forces were provided during the “stance” phase. The results did not depend on the specific instruction given to the subject. Therefore we conclude that minimal contact forces are sufficient for accurate foot trajectory control.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Plum, F. (1960) · Archives of Neurology · doi:10.1001/archneur.1960.03840090124020 · Cited by 10,364
(1992) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/0003-6870(92)90338-v · Cited by 7,112
The co-ordination and regulation of movements
(1969) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0006-8993(69)90278-9 · Cited by 5,043
Taussig, M. (2012) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203397244 · Cited by 2,532
Signal-dependent noise determines motor planning
Harris, C. M., & Wolpert, D. M. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/29528 · Cited by 2,498
The biomechanics and motor control of human gait : normal, elderly and pathological
Winter, D. A. (1991) · University of Waterloo Press eBooks · Cited by 1,428
Control of Locomotion in Bipeds, Tetrapods, and Fish
Grillner, S. (1981) · Comprehensive Physiology · doi:10.1002/cphy.cp010226 · Cited by 1,365
Coding of modified body schema during tool use by macaque postcentral neurones
lriki, A., Tanaka, M., & Iwamura, Y. (1996) · NeuroReport · doi:10.1097/00001756-199610020-00010 · Cited by 1,274 · cited 1×
“On the other hand, contact could also be included as a component of our ego space in a similar way as external objects and tools can be included in our body scheme (Berti and Frassinetti 2000; Iriki et al. 1996; Ivanenko et al. 1997).”
Background(1976) · Advances in Behavioral Biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-0964-3 · Cited by 916
Exercise : regulation and integration of multiple systems
Rowell, L. B., & Shepherd, J. T. (1996) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 806
Cited by
Motor Patterns in Human Walking and Running
Cappellini, G., Ivanenko, Y. P., Poppele, R. E., & Lacquaniti, F. (2006) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00081.2006 · Cited by 798
Self-citationAlterations in muscle activation patterns during robotic-assisted walking
Hidler, J. M., & Wall, A. E. (2005) · Clinical Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2004.09.016 · Cited by 309
Human walking along a curved path. I. Body trajectory, segment orientation and the effect of vision
Courtine, G., & Schieppati, M. (2003) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1046/j.1460-9568.2003.02736.x · Cited by 270
Den Otter, A. R., Geurts, A. C. H., Mulder, T., & Duysens, J. (2006) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2005.08.014 · Cited by 177
Human Biomechanical and Cardiopulmonary Responses to Partial Gravity – A Systematic Review
Richter, C., Braunstein, B., Winnard, A., Nasser, M., & Weber, T. (2017) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2017.00583 · Cited by 75
“For Electromyography (EMG) amplitude and activation patterns inconsistent results were reported, with studies reporting changes in all directions depending on locomotion velocity (Ivanenko et al., 2002) or no (abrupt) changes at all (Sylos Labini et al., 2011).”
MethodResultInfluential
Metadata
- Authors
- Ivanenko, Y. P., Grasso, R., Macellari, V., & Lacquaniti, F.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurophysiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 2002-06-01
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 3070-3089
- ISSN
- 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1598
- OpenAlex
- W2252357040
- Cited by
- 266
- References
- 67
- FWCI
- 29.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Control of Foot Trajectory in Human Locomotion: Role of Ground Contact Forces in Simulated Reduced Gravity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/jn.2002.87.6.3070
- The paper
- Ivanenko, Y. P., Grasso, R., Macellari, V., & Lacquaniti, F. (2002). Control of Foot Trajectory in Human Locomotion: Role of Ground Contact Forces in Simulated Reduced Gravity. Journal of Neurophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.2002.87.6.3070
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.