The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Influence of Context and Behavior on Stimulus Reconstruction From Neural Activity in Primary Auditory Cortex
Open accessAbstract
Population responses of cortical neurons encode considerable details about sensory stimuli, and the encoded information is likely to change with stimulus context and behavioral conditions. The details of encoding are difficult to discern across large sets of single neuron data because of the complexity of naturally occurring stimulus features and cortical receptive fields. To overcome this problem, we used the method of stimulus reconstruction to study how complex sounds are encoded in primary auditory cortex (AI). This method uses a linear spectro-temporal model to map neural population responses to an estimate of the stimulus spectrogram, thereby enabling a direct comparison between the original stimulus and its reconstruction. By assessing the fidelity of such reconstructions from responses to modulated noise stimuli, we estimated the range over which AI neurons can faithfully encode spectro-temporal features. For stimuli containing statistical regularities (typical of those found in complex natural sounds), we found that knowledge of these regularities substantially improves reconstruction accuracy over reconstructions that do not take advantage of this prior knowledge. Finally, contrasting stimulus reconstructions under different behavioral states showed a novel view of the rapid changes in spectro-temporal response properties induced by attentional and motivational state.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Miyawaki, Y., Uchida, H., Yamashita, O., Sato, M.-A., Morito, Y., Tanabe, H. C., Sadato, N., & Kamitani, Y. (2008) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2008.11.004 · Cited by 543
Cited by
Reconstructing Speech from Human Auditory Cortex
Pasley, B. N., David, S. V., Mesgarani, N., Flinker, A., Shamma, S. A., Crone, N. E., Knight, R. T., & Chang, E. F. (2012) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001251 · Cited by 604
Self-citationTowards reconstructing intelligible speech from the human auditory cortex
Akbari, H., Khalighinejad, B., Herrero, J. L., Mehta, A. D., & Mesgarani, N. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-37359-z · Cited by 221
Self-citationDecoding spectrotemporal features of overt and covert speech from the human cortex
Martin, S., Brunner, P., Holdgraf, C., Heinze, H.-J., Crone, N. E., Rieger, J., Schalk, G., Knight, R. T., & Pasley, B. N. (2014) · Frontiers in Neuroengineering · doi:10.3389/fneng.2014.00014 · Cited by 200
Perceptual restoration of masked speech in human cortex
Leonard, M. K., Baud, M. O., Sjerps, M. J., & Chang, E. F. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms13619 · Cited by 170
Metadata
- Authors
- Mesgarani, N., David, S. V., Fritz, J. B., & Shamma, S. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurophysiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 2009-12
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 3329-3339
- ISSN
- 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1598
- OpenAlex
- W1981764347
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Influence of Context and Behavior on Stimulus Reconstruction From Neural Activity in Primary Auditory Cortex. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/jn.91128.2008
- The paper
- Mesgarani, N., David, S. V., Fritz, J. B., & Shamma, S. A. (2009). Influence of Context and Behavior on Stimulus Reconstruction From Neural Activity in Primary Auditory Cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.91128.2008
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.