Cited by 39Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeural dynamics and brain function

Timing-Dependent Regulation of Evoked Spiking in Nucleus Accumbens Neurons by Integration of Limbic and Prefrontal Cortical Inputs

Open access
McGinty, Vincent B., Grace, Anthony A.·2009·Journal of Neurophysiology

Abstract

Single nucleus accumbens (NAcc) neurons receive excitatory synaptic input from cortical and limbic structures, and the integration of converging goal- and motivation-related signals in these neurons influences reward-directed actions. While limbic/cortical synaptic input summation has been characterized at subthreshold intensities, the manner in which multiple inputs govern NAcc neuron spike discharge has not been measured and is poorly understood. Single NAcc neurons were recorded in urethane-anesthetized rats, and spiking was evoked by coincident stimulation of two major NAcc afferent regions: the basolateral amygdala (BLA) and medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC). BLA input increased NAcc spiking elicited by mPFC stimulation depending on the timing of the stimulation pulses, consistent with the summation of monosynaptically evoked excitatory activity. When mPFC input intensity was below threshold for evoked spiking, the addition of BLA input produced the largest facilitation of evoked spiking, and the latency of the evoked spikes reflected the latency of the individual inputs. When mPFC inputs were stimulated at higher intensities, BLA-mediated facilitation was weaker, and the spike latency reflected only the mPFC input. Thus NAcc neurons integrate both the magnitude and timing of afferent synaptic activity, suggesting that NAcc neuron output is strongly dependent on the comparative magnitude of synaptic activity in its afferent structures. These interactions may be crucial integrative mechanisms that allow motivational and cognitive information to produce appropriate reward-directed actions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/jn.91162.2008

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 46 · Cited by 39

Authors
McGinty, V. B., & Grace, A. A.
Affiliations
University of Pittsburgh (US)
Venue
Journal of Neurophysiology
Published
2009-04
Volume
101
Issue
4
Pages
1823-1835
ISSN
  • 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1598
OpenAlex
W2061734625
Cited by
39
References
46
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Neurophysiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (MH-57440, R37MH057440)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
nucleus accumbens, synaptic summation, basolateral amygdala, medial prefrontal cortex, spike latency, motivation, single-unit recording
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Animals, Benzazepines, Biophysics, Brain Mapping, Electric Stimulation, Limbic System, Male, Neural Pathways, Neurons, Nucleus Accumbens, Reaction Time, Salicylamides, Dizocilpine Maleate, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Prefrontal Cortex, Dopamine Antagonists, Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review