Timing-Dependent Regulation of Evoked Spiking in Nucleus Accumbens Neurons by Integration of Limbic and Prefrontal Cortical Inputs
Open accessAbstract
Single nucleus accumbens (NAcc) neurons receive excitatory synaptic input from cortical and limbic structures, and the integration of converging goal- and motivation-related signals in these neurons influences reward-directed actions. While limbic/cortical synaptic input summation has been characterized at subthreshold intensities, the manner in which multiple inputs govern NAcc neuron spike discharge has not been measured and is poorly understood. Single NAcc neurons were recorded in urethane-anesthetized rats, and spiking was evoked by coincident stimulation of two major NAcc afferent regions: the basolateral amygdala (BLA) and medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC). BLA input increased NAcc spiking elicited by mPFC stimulation depending on the timing of the stimulation pulses, consistent with the summation of monosynaptically evoked excitatory activity. When mPFC input intensity was below threshold for evoked spiking, the addition of BLA input produced the largest facilitation of evoked spiking, and the latency of the evoked spikes reflected the latency of the individual inputs. When mPFC inputs were stimulated at higher intensities, BLA-mediated facilitation was weaker, and the spike latency reflected only the mPFC input. Thus NAcc neurons integrate both the magnitude and timing of afferent synaptic activity, suggesting that NAcc neuron output is strongly dependent on the comparative magnitude of synaptic activity in its afferent structures. These interactions may be crucial integrative mechanisms that allow motivational and cognitive information to produce appropriate reward-directed actions.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Accumbens neurons require activation from more than one source to reach threshold, integrating limbic and cortical innervations depending on the intensity and timing of inputs.
“Accumbens neurons require activation from more than one source to reach threshold [87, 88] - integrating limbic and cortical innervations depending on the intensity and timing of inputs [89].”
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 46 · Cited by 39
- Authors
- McGinty, V. B., & Grace, A. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Neurophysiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 2009-04
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1823-1835
- ISSN
- 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1598
- PMC
- PMC2695641
- OpenAlex
- W2061734625
- Cited by
- 39
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 2.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Journal of Neurophysiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (MH-57440, R37MH057440)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Keywords
- nucleus accumbens, synaptic summation, basolateral amygdala, medial prefrontal cortex, spike latency, motivation, single-unit recording
- MeSH terms
- Action Potentials, Animals, Benzazepines, Biophysics, Brain Mapping, Electric Stimulation, Limbic System, Male, Neural Pathways, Neurons, Nucleus Accumbens, Reaction Time, Salicylamides, Dizocilpine Maleate, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Prefrontal Cortex, Dopamine Antagonists, Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review