Cited by 37

Normalization strategy is critical for the outcome of miRNA expression analyses in the rat heart

Brattelid, Trond, Aarnes, Eva-Katrine, Helgeland, Erik, Guvaåg, Steinar, Eichele, Heike, Jonassen, Anne K.·2011·Physiological Genomics

Abstract

Since normalization strategies plays a pivotal role for obtaining reliable results when performing quantitative PCR (qPCR) analyses, this study investigated several miRNA normalization candidates in regards to their efficiency as normalization standards in the ischemic reperfused ex vivo rat heart, with special reference to regulation of the miRNAs miR-1 and miR-101b. The possibility of including primers for several miRNAs in one reverse transcription (RT) reaction was also investigated. Langendorff perfused rat hearts were subjected to 30 min regional ischemia and 0, 1, 5, 15, or 120 min reperfusion. Total RNA was isolated and reverse transcribed for miRNA qPCR analysis. Normalization candidates were evaluated by the NormFinder and geNorm algorithms and the following stability expression rank order was obtained: sno202 < U6B < U87 < snoRNA < 4.5S RNA A < Y1 < 4.5S RNA B < GAPDH. Applying U6B as a normalizer it was found that miR-1 and miR-101b was downregulated in the ischemic reperfused myocardium. Furthermore, up to three primers could be included in one RT reaction by replacing RNase-free water with two supplemental sets of primers in the TaqMan MicroRNA assay protocol. This study demonstrates the importance of validating normalization standards when performing miRNA expression analyses by qPCR, and that miR-1 and miR-101b may play an important role during early reperfusion of the ischemic rat heart.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00131.2010

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brattelid, T., Aarnes, E.-K., Helgeland, E., Guvaåg, S., Eichele, H., & Jonassen, A. K.
Affiliations
Department of Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Bergen, Norway
Venue
Physiological Genomics
Published
2011-05
Volume
43
Issue
10
Pages
604-610
ISSN
  • 1094-8341
  • 1531-2267
Cited by
37
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review