Cited by 278Muscle Physiology and DisordersMuscle metabolism and nutritionExercise and Physiological Responses

Molecular Responses to Acute Exercise and Their Relevance for Adaptations in Skeletal Muscle to Exercise Training

Open access
Egan, Brendan, Sharples, Adam P.·2023·Physiological Reviews

Abstract

Repeated, episodic bouts of skeletal muscle contraction undertaken frequently as structured exercise training are a potent stimulus for physiological adaptation in many organs. Specifically, in skeletal muscle, remarkable plasticity is demonstrated by the remodeling of muscle structure and function in terms of muscular size, force, endurance, and contractile velocity as a result of the functional demands induced by various types of exercise training. This plasticity, and the mechanistic basis for adaptations to skeletal muscle in response to exercise training, are underpinned by activation and/or repression of molecular pathways and processes in response to each individual acute exercise session. These pathways include the transduction of signals arising from neuronal, mechanical, metabolic, and hormonal stimuli through complex signal transduction networks, which are linked to a myriad of effector proteins involved in the regulation of pre- and posttranscriptional processes, and protein translation and degradation processes. This review therefore describes acute exercise-induced signal transduction and the molecular responses to acute exercise in skeletal muscle including emerging concepts such as epigenetic pre- and posttranscriptional regulation and the regulation of protein translation and degradation. A critical appraisal of methodological approaches and the current state of knowledge informs a series of recommendations offered as future directions in the field.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/physrev.00054.2021

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 1,198 · Cited by 278

Authors
Egan, B., & Sharples, A. P.
Affiliations
  • Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition (US)
  • Norwegian School of Sport Sciences (NO)
Corresponding author
  • Egan, Brendan
  • Sharples, Adam P.
Venue
Physiological Reviews
Published
2023-07-01
Volume
103
Issue
3
Pages
2057-2170
ISSN
  • 0031-9333 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1210
OpenAlex
W4309361729
Cited by
278
References
1,198
Citations by year
2026: 86 · 2025: 99 · 2024: 60 · 2023: 33
FWCI
4.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Physiological Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Exercise and Physiological Responses
Keywords
acute exercise, skeletal muscle, training effects, signal transduction, epigenetic regulation, post-transcriptional regulation, mRNA translation, protein degradation, muscle plasticity, muscle remodeling, hormone signaling, mechanical stimulation
MeSH terms
Acclimatization, Adaptation, Physiological, Gene Expression Regulation, Humans, Exercise, Muscle, Skeletal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review