The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Spatial patterning of response to odors in the peripheral olfactory system
Abstract
The low odor specificities of the olfactory receptors suggest that odor recognition depends on the simultaneous activity in an ensemble of receptor neurons. This ensemble could conceivably code quality without reference to the point of origin of each input on the receptor sheet. However, the nose-to-bulb projection appears sufficiently precise to provide the bulb with a topographical map of the receptor sheet although it is poorly delineated in the anteroposterior plane. (It is also known that the morphological changes that follow prolonged exposure to odors are more differentiated in the coronal than in the anteroposterior plane.) Furthermore, it is clear from work at both epithelial and bulbar levels that a spatiotemporal pattern of excitation is generated by odor stimulation of the receptor sheet and that this pattern differs for different odors. This evidence, then, supports the view that there is a spatial component to odor quality coding. This spatial pattern has two elements. One is imposed and depends (at least in part) on differences in the retentivity of different odorants by the mucous sheet, which has powerful sorptive properties. It effectiveness seems particularly weak for odorants with relatively long retention times. The second component is inherent and depends on the tendency of receptors with similar peak odor specificities to aggregate in the same region (or regions) of the epithelium. Different odors or groups of odors maximally excite different regions, which may overlap. The imposed component could not, in itself, provide an adequate mechanism for odor recognition, partly because many compounds have comparable or even identical mean retention times (e.g., enantiomeric isomers). The inherent component, on the other hand, possesses this potential. However, either or both forms of patterning may cooperate with a third nonspatial mechanism (based on differential responsiveness of receptors to different odors) in coding odor quality.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
How brains make chaos in order to make sense of the world
Skarda, C. A., & Freeman, W. J. (1987) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00047336 · Cited by 2,097
Doty, R. L., Brugger, W. E., Jurs, P. C., Orndorff, M. A., Snyder, P. J., & Lowry, L. D. (1978) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/0031-9384(78)90070-7 · Cited by 677
Schwartz, E. L. (1980) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/0042-6989(80)90090-5 · Cited by 593
Functional organization of olfactory system
Shipley, M. T., & Ennis, M. (1996) · Journal of Neurobiology · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-4695(199605)30:1<123::aid-neu11>3.0.co;2-n · Cited by 573
Spatial EEG patterns, non-linear dynamics and perception: the neo-sherringtonian view
Freeman, W. J., & Skarda, C. A. (1985) · Brain Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/0165-0173(85)90022-0 · Cited by 572
Metadata
- Authors
- Moulton, D. G.
- Venue
- Physiological Reviews
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 1976-07-01
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 578-593
- ISSN
- 0031-9333 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1210
- OpenAlex
- W2299985760
- Cited by
- 180
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spatial patterning of response to odors in the peripheral olfactory system. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/physrev.1976.56.3.578
- The paper
- Moulton, D. G. (1976). Spatial patterning of response to odors in the peripheral olfactory system. Physiological Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.1976.56.3.578
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.