The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Physiology and biochemistry of Drosophila learning mutants
Abstract
Single gene mutants of Drosophila that are defective in learning/memory processes have increased substantially our understanding of the physiology, biochemistry, and anatomy underlying conditioned behaviors. Drosophila learning mutants can be separated into two general classes, those with structural defects in the brain and those without (conditioning mutants) any obvious brain alterations. From studies of brain structural mutants, two neuroanatomic areas have merged as important for normal conditioned behavior: the mushroom bodies and the central complex. Biochemical and molecular genetic studies of the conditioning mutants have implicated numerous types of molecules in learning, but the adenosine 3',5'-cyclic monophosphate (cAMP) second messenger pathway has emerged as especially important. Five different genes in this pathway, amnesiac (a product similar to adenylate cyclase activating peptides), dunce (cAMP phosophodiesterase), rutabaga (adenylyl cyclase), DCO (protein kinase A), and dCREB2 (cAMP-response element binding protein), have proven important for normal learning. The products of many of these learning mutants are enriched in mushroom bodies, which highlight the importance of mushroom bodies for normal learning and the cAMP second messenger cascade for the physiology of mushroom body cells in their role(s) underlying learning. Physiological studies of the mutants have demonstrated that plastic properties of synaptic transmission, including facilitation and posttetanic potentiation, are abnormal in the mutants. An appendix describing the currently used paradigms to test Drosophila behavior is included.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Abel, T., Nguyen, P. V., Barad, M., Deuel, T. A. S., Kandel, E. R., & Bourtchouladze, R. (1997) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81904-2 · Cited by 1,217
The DISC locus in psychiatric illness
Chubb, J. E., Bradshaw, N. J., Soares, D. C., Porteous, D. J., & Millar, J. K. (2008) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/sj.mp.4002106 · Cited by 542
Neuronal assemblies of the Drosophila mushroom body
Tanaka, N. K., Tanimoto, H., & Ito, K. (2008) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.21692 · Cited by 470
Circadian rhythms in olfactory responses of Drosophila melanogaster
Krishnan, B., Dryer, S. E., & Hardin, P. E. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/22566 · Cited by 332
Functional senescence in Drosophila melanogaster
Grotewiel, M. S., Martin, I., Bhandari, P., & Cook-Wiens, E. (2005) · Ageing Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.arr.2005.04.001 · Cited by 323
Metadata
- Authors
- Davis, R. L.
- Venue
- Physiological Reviews
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 1996-04-01
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 299-317
- ISSN
- 0031-9333 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1210
- OpenAlex
- W1867514631
- Cited by
- 296
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Physiology and biochemistry of Drosophila learning mutants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/physrev.1996.76.2.299
- The paper
- Davis, R. L. (1996). Physiology and biochemistry of Drosophila learning mutants. Physiological Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.1996.76.2.299
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.